mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Distill and De-bias: Mitigating Bias in Face Verification using Knowledge Distillation

arXiv 2112.09786 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2021cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Face recognition networks generally demonstrate bias with respect to sensitive attributes like gender, skintone etc. For gender and skintone, we observe that the regions of the face that a network attends to vary by the category of an attribute. This might contribute to bias. Building on this intuition, we propose a novel distillation-based approach called Distill and De-bias (D&D) to enforce a network to attend to similar face regions, irrespective of the attribute category. In D&D, we train a teacher network on images from one category of an attribute; e.g. light skintone. Then distilling information from the teacher, we train a student network on images of the remaining category; e.g., dark skintone. A feature-level distillation loss constrains the student network to generate teacher-like representations. This allows the student network to attend to similar face regions for all attribute categories and enables it to reduce bias. We also propose a second distillation step on top of D&D, called D&D++. Here, we distill the `un-biasedness' of the D&D network into a new student network, the D&D++ network, while training this new network on all attribute categories; e.g., both light and dark skintones. This helps us train a network that is less biased for an attribute, while obtaining higher face verification performance than D&D. We show that D&D++ outperforms existing baselines in reducing gender and skintone bias on the IJB-C dataset, while obtaining higher face verification performance than existing adversarial de-biasing methods. We evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed methods on two state-of-the-art face recognition networks: ArcFace and Crystalface.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2021.

Builds on

40 of 74 references.

References · 40

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  4. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
  5. 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,313
  6. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  7. 2014FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Netscited by 1,619
  8. 2018BiSeNet: Bilateral Segmentation Network for Real-time Semantic Segmentationcited by 645
  9. 2016MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognitioncited by 621
  10. 2021MagFace: A Universal Representation for Face Recognition and Quality Assessmentcited by 332
  11. 2018Learning without Memorizingcited by 249
  12. 2019Mitigate Bias in Face Recognition using Skewness-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
28 more
  1. 2018Turning a Blind Eye: Explicit Removal of Biases and Variation from Deep Neural Network Embeddingscited by 114
  2. 2020Demographic Bias in Biometrics: A Survey on an Emerging Challengecited by 93
  3. 2020Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 87
  4. 2020Face Recognition: Too Bias, or Not Too Bias?cited by 82
  5. 2020Mitigating Face Recognition Bias via Group Adaptive Classifiercited by 67
  6. 2021Fair Feature Distillation for Visual Recognitioncited by 59
  7. 2019Accuracy comparison across face recognition algorithms: Where are we on measuring race bias?cited by 56
  8. 2021Understanding and Mitigating Annotation Bias in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 50
  9. 2020Analysis of Gender Inequality In Face Recognition Accuracycited by 47
  10. 2016An All-In-One Convolutional Neural Network for Face Analysiscited by 45
  11. 2016UMDFaces: An Annotated Face Dataset for Training Deep Networkscited by 42
  12. 2019Characterizing the Variability in Face Recognition Accuracy Relative to Racecited by 40
  13. 2021Consistent Instance False Positive Improves Fairness in Face Recognitioncited by 40
  14. 2021PASS: Protected Attribute Suppression System for Mitigating Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 38
  15. 2020How Does Gender Balance In Training Data Affect Face Recognition Accuracy?cited by 37
  16. 2018An Experimental Evaluation of Covariates Effects on Unconstrained Face Verificationcited by 28
  17. 2019Deep Learning for Face Recognition: Pride or Prejudiced?cited by 25
  18. 2020Is Face Recognition Sexist? No, Gendered Hairstyles and Biology Arecited by 23
  19. 2021Rethinking Common Assumptions to Mitigate Racial Bias in Face Recognition Datasetscited by 22
  20. 2021Anatomizing Bias in Facial Analysiscited by 18
  21. 2021Balancing Biases and Preserving Privacy on Balanced Faces in the Wildcited by 17
  22. 2018Deep Convolutional Neural Networks in the Face of Caricature: Identity and Image Revealedcited by 16
  23. 2016Triplet Probabilistic Embedding for Face Verification and Clusteringcited by 14
  24. 2017The Do's and Don'ts for CNN-based Face Verificationcited by 13
  25. 2019How are attributes expressed in face DCNNs?cited by 13
  26. 2020Towards Gender-Neutral Face Descriptors for Mitigating Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 11
  27. 2018A Fast and Accurate System for Face Detection, Identification, and Verificationcited by 10
  28. 2019On measuring the iconicity of a facecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

6 papers.