Linking convolutional kernel size to generalization bias in face analysis CNNs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training dataset biases are by far the most scrutinized factors when explaining algorithmic biases of neural networks. In contrast, hyperparameters related to the neural network architecture have largely been ignored even though different network parameterizations are known to induce different implicit biases over learned features. For example, convolutional kernel size is known to affect the frequency content of features learned in CNNs. In this work, we present a causal framework for linking an architectural hyperparameter to out-of-distribution algorithmic bias. Our framework is experimental, in that we train several versions of a network with an intervention to a specific hyperparameter, and measure the resulting causal effect of this choice on performance bias when a particular out-of-distribution image perturbation is applied. In our experiments, we focused on measuring the causal relationship between convolutional kernel size and face analysis classification bias across different subpopulations (race/gender), with respect to high-frequency image details. We show that modifying kernel size, even in one layer of a CNN, changes the frequency content of learned features significantly across data subgroups leading to biased generalization performance even in the presence of a balanced dataset.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2023.
Builds on
42 of 59 references.
References · 42
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
- 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 429
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
- 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
- 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
- 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
30 more
- 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
- 2019REPAIR: Removing Representation Bias by Dataset Resamplingcited by 157
- 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
- 2020Fair Attribute Classification through Latent Space De-biasingcited by 125
- 2019Fairness in Deep Learning: A Computational Perspectivecited by 123
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noisecited by 114
- 2021The MultiBERTs: BERT Reproductions for Robustness Analysiscited by 92
- 2019FairFace: Face Attribute Dataset for Balanced Race, Gender, and Agecited by 87
- 2018Adversarial examples from computational constraintscited by 80
- 2018Adversarial vulnerability for any classifiercited by 78
- 2019Diversity in Facescited by 77
- 2016A Boundary Tilting Persepective on the Phenomenon of Adversarial Examplescited by 70
- 2020Towards causal benchmarking of bias in face analysis algorithmscited by 64
- 2022Leveling Down in Computer Vision: Pareto Inefficiencies in Fair Deep Classifierscited by 53
- 2019Discrimination in the Age of Algorithmscited by 51
- 2020Analysis of Gender Inequality In Face Recognition Accuracycited by 47
- 2018The Curse of Concentration in Robust Learning: Evasion and Poisoning Attacks from Concentration of Measurecited by 46
- 2020Fair Bayesian Optimizationcited by 45
- 2020Empirical observation of negligible fairness-accuracy trade-offs in machine learning for public policycited by 44
- 2018FNNC: Achieving Fairness through Neural Networkscited by 43
- 2021Your fairness may vary: Pretrained language model fairness in toxic text classificationcited by 39
- 2017Empirically Analyzing the Effect of Dataset Biases on Deep Face Recognition Systemscited by 28
- 2020LiFT: A Scalable Framework for Measuring Fairness in ML Applicationscited by 22
- 2019Tackling Algorithmic Bias in Neural-Network Classifiers using Wasserstein-2 Regularizationcited by 18
- 2021Promoting Fairness through Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 17
- 2020Local Convolutions Cause an Implicit Bias towards High Frequency Adversarial Examplescited by 9
- 2021Pairwise Fairness for Ordinal Regressioncited by 6
- 2021Bridging the Gap Between Adversarial Robustness and Optimization Biascited by 5
- 2021Matched sample selection with GANs for mitigating attribute confoundingcited by 4
- 2022Understanding robustness and generalization of artificial neural networks through Fourier maskscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.