mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Gender Gap in Face Recognition Accuracy Is a Hairy Problem

arXiv 2206.04867 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2022cs.CV cs.AIcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is broadly accepted that there is a "gender gap" in face recognition accuracy, with females having higher false match and false non-match rates. However, relatively little is known about the cause(s) of this gender gap. Even the recent NIST report on demographic effects lists "analyze cause and effect" under "what we did not do". We first demonstrate that female and male hairstyles have important differences that impact face recognition accuracy. In particular, compared to females, male facial hair contributes to creating a greater average difference in appearance between different male faces. We then demonstrate that when the data used to estimate recognition accuracy is balanced across gender for how hairstyles occlude the face, the initially observed gender gap in accuracy largely disappears. We show this result for two different matchers, and analyzing images of Caucasians and of African-Americans. These results suggest that future research on demographic variation in accuracy should include a check for balanced quality of the test data as part of the problem formulation. To promote reproducible research, matchers, attribute classifiers, and datasets used in this research are/will be publicly available.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2022.

Builds on

15 of 40 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 911
  3. 2018BiSeNet: Bilateral Segmentation Network for Real-time Semantic Segmentationcited by 645
  4. 2016MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognitioncited by 621
  5. 2020Demographic Bias in Biometrics: A Survey on an Emerging Challengecited by 93
  6. 2021A Comprehensive Study on Face Recognition Biases Beyond Demographicscited by 86
  7. 2019Diversity in Facescited by 77
  8. 2020img2pose: Face Alignment and Detection via 6DoF, Face Pose Estimationcited by 57
  9. 2020Analysis of Gender Inequality In Face Recognition Accuracycited by 47
  10. 2019Characterizing the Variability in Face Recognition Accuracy Relative to Racecited by 40
  11. 2020How Does Gender Balance In Training Data Affect Face Recognition Accuracy?cited by 37
  12. 2021Gendered Differences in Face Recognition Accuracy Explained by Hairstyles, Makeup, and Facial Morphologycited by 32
3 more
  1. 2018An Experimental Evaluation of Covariates Effects on Unconstrained Face Verificationcited by 28
  2. 2020Is Face Recognition Sexist? No, Gendered Hairstyles and Biology Arecited by 23
  3. 2019Does Face Recognition Accuracy Get Better With Age? Deep Face Matchers Say Nocited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 7; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: