Mitigating Bias with Words: Inducing Demographic Ambiguity in Face Recognition Templates by Text Encoding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Face recognition (FR) systems are often prone to demographic biases, partially due to the entanglement of demographic-specific information with identity-relevant features in facial embeddings. This bias is extremely critical in large multicultural cities, especially where biometrics play a major role in smart city infrastructure. The entanglement can cause demographic attributes to overshadow identity cues in the embedding space, resulting in disparities in verification performance across different demographic groups. To address this issue, we propose a novel strategy, Unified Text-Image Embedding (UTIE), which aims to induce demographic ambiguity in face embeddings by enriching them with information related to other demographic groups. This encourages face embeddings to emphasize identity-relevant features and thus promotes fairer verification performance across groups. UTIE leverages the zero-shot capabilities and cross-modal semantic alignment of Vision-Language Models (VLMs). Given that VLMs are naturally trained to align visual and textual representations, we enrich the facial embeddings of each demographic group with text-derived demographic features extracted from other demographic groups. This encourages a more neutral representation in terms of demographic attributes. We evaluate UTIE using three VLMs, CLIP, OpenCLIP, and SigLIP, on two widely used benchmarks, RFW and BFW, designed to assess bias in FR. Experimental results show that UTIE consistently reduces bias metrics while maintaining, or even improving in several cases, the face verification accuracy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2025.
Builds on
29 of 39 references.
References · 29
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,588
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,314
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,141
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,855
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,068
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,164
- 2022PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Modelcited by 764
- 2018Deep Face Recognition: A Surveycited by 275
- 2019Mitigate Bias in Face Recognition using Skewness-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
- 2018Turning a Blind Eye: Explicit Removal of Biases and Variation from Deep Neural Network Embeddingscited by 114
- 2020Demographic Bias in Biometrics: A Survey on an Emerging Challengecited by 93
- 2020Saving Face: Investigating the Ethical Concerns of Facial Recognition Auditingcited by 89
17 more
- 2020Face Recognition: Too Bias, or Not Too Bias?cited by 82
- 2022Meta Balanced Network for Fair Face Recognitioncited by 53
- 2020SensitiveLoss: Improving Accuracy and Fairness of Face Representations with Discrimination-Aware Deep Learningcited by 50
- 2020Analysis of Gender Inequality In Face Recognition Accuracycited by 47
- 2019Characterizing the Variability in Face Recognition Accuracy Relative to Racecited by 40
- 2021Consistent Instance False Positive Improves Fairness in Face Recognitioncited by 40
- 2021Biometrics: Trust, but Verifycited by 39
- 2021PASS: Protected Attribute Suppression System for Mitigating Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 38
- 2018An Experimental Evaluation of Covariates Effects on Unconstrained Face Verificationcited by 28
- 2020Post-Comparison Mitigation of Demographic Bias in Face Recognition Using Fair Score Normalizationcited by 28
- 2024FRoundation: Are Foundation Models Ready for Face Recognition?cited by 23
- 2023Logical Consistency and Greater Descriptive Power for Facial Hair Attribute Learningcited by 15
- 202550 Years of Automated Face Recognitioncited by 14
- 2021Demographic Fairness in Biometric Systems: What do the Experts say?cited by 12
- 2023Bias and Diversity in Synthetic-based Face Recognitioncited by 11
- 2024VariFace: Fair and Diverse Synthetic Dataset Generation for Face Recognitioncited by 8
- 2024Fairer Analysis and Demographically Balanced Face Generation for Fairer Face Verificationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025DemoBias: An Empirical Study to Trace Demographic Biases in Vision Foundation Models
- 2026Demographic Fairness in Multimodal LLMs: A Benchmark of Gender and Ethnicity Bias in Face Verification
- 2025Vision-Language Models display a strong gender bias
- 2023Fair Text-to-Image Diffusion via Fair Mapping
- 2025Data Matters Most: Auditing Social Bias in Contrastive Vision Language Models
- 2026Embedding Arithmetic: A Lightweight, Tuning-Free Framework for Post-hoc Bias Mitigation in Text-to-Image Models
- 2024Exploring Vision Language Models for Facial Attribute Recognition: Emotion, Race, Gender, and Age
- 2025Person-Centric Annotations of LAION-400M: Auditing Bias and Its Transfer to Models