Effective and Robust Adversarial Training against Data and Label Corruptions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Corruptions due to data perturbations and label noise are prevalent in the datasets from unreliable sources, which poses significant threats to model training. Despite existing efforts in developing robust models, current learning methods commonly overlook the possible co-existence of both corruptions, limiting the effectiveness and practicability of the model. In this paper, we develop an Effective and Robust Adversarial Training (ERAT) framework to simultaneously handle two types of corruption (i.e., data and label) without prior knowledge of their specifics. We propose a hybrid adversarial training surrounding multiple potential adversarial perturbations, alongside a semi-supervised learning based on class-rebalancing sample selection to enhance the resilience of the model for dual corruption. On the one hand, in the proposed adversarial training, the perturbation generation module learns multiple surrogate malicious data perturbations by taking a DNN model as the victim, while the model is trained to maintain semantic consistency between the original data and the hybrid perturbed data. It is expected to enable the model to cope with unpredictable perturbations in real-world data corruption. On the other hand, a class-rebalancing data selection strategy is designed to fairly differentiate clean labels from noisy labels. Semi-supervised learning is performed accordingly by discarding noisy labels. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of the proposed ERAT framework.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2024.
Builds on
47 of 77 references.
References · 47
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
- 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,054
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
35 more
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 728
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2016Delving into Transferable Adversarial Examples and Black-box Attackscited by 530
- 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
- 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 411
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
- 2021Unlearnable Examples: Making Personal Data Unexploitablecited by 188
- 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
- 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
- 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
- 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
- 2021Adversarial Examples Make Strong Poisonscited by 115
- 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
- 2022UNICON: Combating Label Noise Through Uniform Selection and Contrastive Learningcited by 77
- 2019Learning to Confuse: Generating Training Time Adversarial Data with Auto-Encodercited by 70
- 2021Availability Attacks Create Shortcutscited by 60
- 2021Better Safe Than Sorry: Preventing Delusive Adversaries with Adversarial Trainingcited by 58
- 2023Image Shortcut Squeezing: Countering Perturbative Availability Poisons with Compressioncited by 39
- 2023Learning the Unlearnable: Adversarial Augmentations Suppress Unlearnable Example Attackscited by 28
- 2020Frame-wise Cross-modal Matching for Video Moment Retrievalcited by 26
- 2020Stronger and Faster Wasserstein Adversarial Attackscited by 25
- 2022Trustable Co-label Learning from Multiple Noisy Annotatorscited by 12
- 2022GSMFlow: Generation Shifts Mitigating Flow for Generalized Zero-Shot Learningcited by 12
- 2019Perceptual Quality-preserving Black-Box Attack against Deep Learning Image Classifierscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.