mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervision

arXiv 1711.10160 ↗First posted 28 Nov 2017cs.LG stat.MLcited by 372

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Labeling training data is increasingly the largest bottleneck in deploying machine learning systems. We present Snorkel, a first-of-its-kind system that enables users to train state-of-the-art models without hand labeling any training data. Instead, users write labeling functions that express arbitrary heuristics, which can have unknown accuracies and correlations. Snorkel denoises their outputs without access to ground truth by incorporating the first end-to-end implementation of our recently proposed machine learning paradigm, data programming. We present a flexible interface layer for writing labeling functions based on our experience over the past year collaborating with companies, agencies, and research labs. In a user study, subject matter experts build models 2.8x faster and increase predictive performance an average 45.5% versus seven hours of hand labeling. We study the modeling tradeoffs in this new setting and propose an optimizer for automating tradeoff decisions that gives up to 1.8x speedup per pipeline execution. In two collaborations, with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and on four open-source text and image data sets representative of other deployments, Snorkel provides 132% average improvements to predictive performance over prior heuristic approaches and comes within an average 3.60% of the predictive performance of large hand-curated training sets.

Key facts. Cited by 372 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2018: 1; 2019: 0; 2020: 0; 2021: 78; 2022: 92; 2023: 59; 2024: 40; 2025: 43; 2026: 59.

372 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 644
  2. 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 467
  3. 2023Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science?cited by 250
  4. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 210
  5. 2022Large Language Models are Few-Shot Clinical Information Extractorscited by 207
  6. 2023Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 203
  7. 2022Ask Me Anything: A simple strategy for prompting language modelscited by 155
  8. 2023On the Tool Manipulation Capability of Open-source Large Language Modelscited by 122
  9. 2021Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspectivecited by 116
  10. 2023Language Models Enable Simple Systems for Generating Structured Views of Heterogeneous Data Lakescited by 111
  11. 2021Robustness Gym: Unifying the NLP Evaluation Landscapecited by 108
  12. 2021WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervisioncited by 96
38 more
  1. 2023CoAnnotating: Uncertainty-Guided Work Allocation between Human and Large Language Models for Data Annotationcited by 94
  2. 2025Harnessing Multiple Large Language Models: A Survey on LLM Ensemblecited by 86
  3. 2022Learning to Compose Soft Prompts for Compositional Zero-Shot Learningcited by 67
  4. 2022A Survey on Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 66
  5. 2022Leveraging Explanations in Interactive Machine Learning: An Overviewcited by 53
  6. 2021Self-Training with Weak Supervisioncited by 49
  7. 2024Theoretical Analysis of Weak-to-Strong Generalizationcited by 48
  8. 2021Improved Regularization and Robustness for Fine-tuning in Neural Networkscited by 45
  9. 2022TwiBot-22: Towards Graph-Based Twitter Bot Detectioncited by 44
  10. 2022Contrastive language and vision learning of general fashion conceptscited by 42
  11. 2021End-to-End Weak Supervisioncited by 33
  12. 2021A Data Quality-Driven View of MLOpscited by 31
  13. 2021Universalizing Weak Supervisioncited by 27
  14. 2021VolcanoML: Speeding up End-to-End AutoML via Scalable Search Space Decompositioncited by 25
  15. 2022Operationalizing Machine Learning: An Interview Studycited by 25
  16. 2021Knowledge Enhanced Machine Learning Pipeline against Diverse Adversarial Attackscited by 24
  17. 2022Co-training Improves Prompt-based Learning for Large Language Modelscited by 24
  18. 2025Shrinking the Generation-Verification Gap with Weak Verifierscited by 24
  19. 2021Whither AutoML? Understanding the Role of Automation in Machine Learning Workflowscited by 22
  20. 2022A general-purpose material property data extraction pipeline from large polymer corpora using Natural Language Processingcited by 22
  21. 2021Weakly Supervised Named Entity Tagging with Learnable Logical Rulescited by 21
  22. 2021Factoring Statutory Reasoning as Language Understanding Challengescited by 20
  23. 2021CLIP: A Dataset for Extracting Action Items for Physicians from Hospital Discharge Notescited by 20
  24. 2023ScatterShot: Interactive In-context Example Curation for Text Transformationcited by 20
  25. 2022E2S2: Encoding-Enhanced Sequence-to-Sequence Pretraining for Language Understanding and Generationcited by 19
  26. 2022Training Subset Selection for Weak Supervisioncited by 19
  27. 2021OmniFair: A Declarative System for Model-Agnostic Group Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 18
  28. 2021DP-SSL: Towards Robust Semi-supervised Learning with A Few Labeled Samplescited by 18
  29. 2021SynthBio: A Case Study in Human-AI Collaborative Curation of Text Datasetscited by 18
  30. 2022Shoring Up the Foundations: Fusing Model Embeddings and Weak Supervisioncited by 18
  31. 2022A Survey on Aspect-Based Sentiment Classificationcited by 18
  32. 2022Measuring Datacited by 18
  33. 2021skweak: Weak Supervision Made Easy for NLPcited by 17
  34. 2022Data Debugging with Shapley Importance over End-to-End Machine Learning Pipelinescited by 17
  35. 2022Learning Hyper Label Model for Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 16
  36. 2021BERTifying the Hidden Markov Model for Multi-Source Weakly Supervised Named Entity Recognitioncited by 15
  37. 2021Teaching Autoregressive Language Models Complex Tasks By Demonstrationcited by 15
  38. 2021Weakly Supervised Text-to-SQL Parsing through Question Decompositioncited by 15

50 most cited of 372 All 372 (JSON)