mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LEAD: Iterative Data Selection for Efficient LLM Instruction Tuning

arXiv 2505.07437 ↗First posted 12 May 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.DBcited by 13

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction tuning has emerged as a critical paradigm for improving the capabilities and alignment of large language models (LLMs). However, existing iterative model-aware data selection methods incur significant computational overhead, as they rely on repeatedly performing full-dataset model inference to estimate sample utility for subsequent training iterations, creating a fundamental efficiency bottleneck. In this paper, we propose LEAD, an efficient iterative data selection framework that accurately estimates sample utility entirely within the standard training loop, eliminating the need for costly additional model inference. At its core, LEAD introduces Instance-Level Dynamic Uncertainty (IDU), a theoretically grounded utility function combining instantaneous training loss, gradient-based approximation of loss changes, and exponential smoothing of historical loss signals. To further scale efficiently to large datasets, LEAD employs a two-stage, coarse-to-fine selection strategy, adaptively prioritizing informative clusters through a multi-armed bandit mechanism, followed by precise fine-grained selection of high-utility samples using IDU. Extensive experiments across four diverse benchmarks show that LEAD significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, improving average model performance by 6.1%-10.8% while using only 2.5% of the training data and reducing overall training time by 5-10x.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 29 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2025.

Builds on

29 of 66 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment18 May
  2. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment14 Apr

Other references · 27

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  6. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
  7. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 839
  8. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
  9. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
  10. 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 488
  11. 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 408
  12. 2022Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Laborcited by 397
15 more
  1. 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 372
  2. 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 236
  3. 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 138
  4. 2023DataInf: Efficiently Estimating Data Influence in LoRA-tuned LLMs and Diffusion Modelscited by 123
  5. 2023#InsTag: Instruction Tagging for Analyzing Supervised Fine-tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 109
  6. 2024What is Your Data Worth to GPT? LLM-Scale Data Valuation with Influence Functionscited by 94
  7. 2024The Dawn of Natural Language to SQL: Are We Fully Ready?cited by 79
  8. 2023Data Diversity Matters for Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 76
  9. 2024A Survey of Text-to-SQL in the Era of LLMs: Where are we, and where are we going?cited by 56
  10. 2023Self-Evolved Diverse Data Sampling for Efficient Instruction Tuningcited by 52
  11. 2024SmallToLarge (S2L): Scalable Data Selection for Fine-tuning Large Language Models by Summarizing Training Trajectories of Small Modelscited by 44
  12. 2024Diversify and Conquer: Diversity-Centric Data Selection with Iterative Refinementcited by 13
  13. 2024ItD: Large Language Models Can Teach Themselves Induction through Deductioncited by 8
  14. 2024IterSelectTune: An Iterative Training Framework for Efficient Instruction-Tuning Data Selectioncited by 6
  15. 2024Instruction Embedding: Latent Representations of Instructions Towards Task Identificationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 11.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Unleashing the Power of Data Tsunami: A Comprehensive Survey on Data Assessment and Selection for Instruction Tuning of Language Models
  2. 2025Towards Alignment-Centric Paradigm: A Survey of Instruction Tuning in Large Language Models
  3. 2024ROSE: A Reward-Oriented Data Selection Framework for LLM Task-Specific Instruction Tuning
  4. 2024Take the essence and discard the dross: A Rethinking on Data Selection for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models
  5. 2024How to Train Data-Efficient LLMs
  6. 2024Selective Reflection-Tuning: Student-Selected Data Recycling for LLM Instruction-Tuning
  7. 2026Aligning the Query Space: Greedy Information Projection for Language Model Data Selection
  8. 2025Diversity-driven Data Selection for Language Model Tuning through Sparse Autoencoder