mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Decision-Support Audit Protocol for Supervision Drift in Proxy-Labeled Credit-Risk Prediction

arXiv 2609.16102 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Credit-risk models are trained on proxy labels and deployed under temporal and segment change, yet no single transfer metric separates base-rate shift, probability-scale shift, and feature-label relationship change. We contribute a design-science artifact: a locked, multi-signal audit protocol for supervision drift in proxy-labeled credit-risk prediction. Five layers (transfer performance, an oracle-gap probe, a calibration diagnostic, feature-label stability, and a synthetic positive control), thresholds, and decision rules were locked before interpretation; a bounded reading is a designed outcome. On a public LendingClub dataset (temporal 2013 to 2016 and cross-segment transfer), ranking is stable and oracle gaps are small; the clearest temporal signal is a prevalence and probability-scale mismatch that intercept-only diagnostic recalibration largely reduces, though its cause is not identifiable from the available release. The positive control responds only to larger injected shifts; subtler drift cannot be excluded. Mapping diagnostic patterns to governance actions is conceptual guidance, not validated here.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.

Builds on

10 of 22 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  2. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  3. 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 372
  4. 2018Detecting and Correcting for Label Shift with Black Box Predictorscited by 366
  5. 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
  6. 2022Deep Learning vs. Gradient Boosting: Benchmarking state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms for credit scoringcited by 6
  7. 2019Shallow Self-Learning for Reject Inference in Credit Scoringcited by 5
  8. 2021Managing dataset shift by adversarial validation for credit scoringcited by 3
  9. 2026Modeling and Controlling Deployment Reliability under Temporal Distribution Shiftcited by 1
  10. 2026Learning Stable Predictors from Weak Supervision under Distribution Shiftcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.