mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AlphaEval: Evaluating Agents in Production

arXiv 2604.12162 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2026cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid deployment of AI agents in commercial settings has outpaced the development of evaluation methodologies that reflect production realities. Existing benchmarks measure agent capabilities through retrospectively curated tasks with well-specified requirements and deterministic metrics -- conditions that diverge fundamentally from production environments where requirements contain implicit constraints, inputs are heterogeneous multi-modal documents with information fragmented across sources, tasks demand undeclared domain expertise, outputs are long-horizon professional deliverables, and success is judged by domain experts whose standards evolve over time. We present AlphaEval, a production-grounded benchmark of 94 tasks sourced from seven companies deploying AI agents in their core business, spanning six O*NET (Occupational Information Network) domains. Unlike model-centric benchmarks, AlphaEval evaluates complete agent products -- Claude Code, Codex, etc. -- as commercial systems, capturing performance variations invisible to model-level evaluation. Our evaluation framework covers multiple paradigms (LLM-as-a-Judge, reference-driven metrics, formal verification, rubric-based assessment, automated UI testing, etc.), with individual domains composing multiple paradigms. Beyond the benchmark itself, we contribute a requirement-to-benchmark construction framework -- a systematic methodology that transforms authentic production requirements into executable evaluation tasks in minimal time. This framework standardizes the entire pipeline from requirement to evaluation, providing a reproducible, modular process that any organization can adopt to construct production-grounded benchmarks for their own domains.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 78 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.

Builds on

78 of 96 references.

Closest ancestors · 14

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026OneMillion-Bench: How Far are Language Agents from Human Experts?9 Mar
  2. 2026Toward Scalable Verifiable Reward: Proxy State-Based Evaluation for Multi-turn Tool-Calling LLM Agents18 Feb
  3. 2026AD-Bench: A Real-World, Trajectory-Aware Advertising Analytics Benchmark for LLM Agents15 Feb
  4. 2026Gaia2: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Dynamic and Asynchronous Environments12 Feb
  5. 2026AgentIF-OneDay: A Task-level Instruction-Following Benchmark for General AI Agents in Daily Scenarios28 Jan
  6. 2026AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World Contexts16 Jan
  7. 2025DeliveryBench: Can Agents Earn Profit in Real World?22 Dec
  8. 2025The Tool Decathlon: Benchmarking Language Agents for Diverse, Realistic, and Long-Horizon Task Execution29 Oct
  9. 2025OdysseyBench: Evaluating LLM Agents on Long-Horizon Complex Office Application Workflows12 Aug
  10. 2024TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Tasks18 Dec
  11. 2024Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agents14 Oct
  12. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains17 Jun
2 more
  1. 2024AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents24 Jan
  2. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents7 Aug

Other references · 64

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  3. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  4. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  5. 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
  6. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
  7. 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,582
  8. 2024Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysiscited by 1,375
  9. 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,134
  10. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
  11. 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 651
  12. 2025BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agentscited by 616
38 more
  1. 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 558
  2. 2026Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfacescited by 515
  3. 2024AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agentscited by 359
  4. 2026SkillsBench: Benchmarking How Well Agent Skills Work Across Diverse Taskscited by 289
  5. 2025PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Researchcited by 286
  6. 2024FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AIcited by 227
  7. 2025KernelBench: Can LLMs Write Efficient GPU Kernels?cited by 206
  8. 2024SWE-bench Multimodal: Do AI Systems Generalize to Visual Software Domains?cited by 196
  9. 2025ARC-AGI-2: A New Challenge for Frontier AI Reasoning Systemscited by 171
  10. 2025Multi-SWE-bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Issue Resolvingcited by 165
  11. 2024SWT-Bench: Testing and Validating Real-World Bug-Fixes with Code Agentscited by 129
  12. 2024DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents from Becoming Data Science Experts?cited by 119
  13. 2025xbench: Tracking Agents Productivity Scaling with Profession-Aligned Real-World Evaluationscited by 118
  14. 2024CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmarkcited by 115
  15. 2025CodeElo: Benchmarking Competition-level Code Generation of LLMs with Human-comparable Elo Ratingscited by 109
  16. 2025SWE-Lancer: Can Frontier LLMs Earn 1 Million from Real-World Freelance Software Engineering?cited by 99
  17. 2025MCP-Universe: Benchmarking Large Language Models with Real-World Model Context Protocol Serverscited by 89
  18. 2025Proof or Bluff? Evaluating LLMs on 2025 USA Math Olympiadcited by 72
  19. 2026MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Taskscited by 72
  20. 2025ACEBench: Who Wins the Match Point in Tool Usage?cited by 66
  21. 2025AstaBench: Rigorous Benchmarking of AI Agents with a Scientific Research Suitecited by 45
  22. 2024Prompting Large Language Models to Tackle the Full Software Development Lifecycle: A Case Studycited by 40
  23. 2025EXP-Bench: Can AI Conduct AI Research Experiments?cited by 36
  24. 2025ResearchCodeBench: Benchmarking LLMs on Implementing Novel Machine Learning Research Codecited by 34
  25. 2026LongCLI-Bench: A Preliminary Benchmark and Study for Long-horizon Agentic Programming in Command-Line Interfacescited by 29
  26. 2025A Novel Evaluation Benchmark for Medical LLMs: Illuminating Safety and Effectiveness in Clinical Domainscited by 28
  27. 2026Unsafer in Many Turns: Benchmarking and Defending Multi-Turn Safety Risks in Tool-Using Agentscited by 28
  28. 2026WebWorld: A Large-Scale World Model for Web Agent Trainingcited by 23
  29. 2025DAComp: Benchmarking Data Agents across the Full Data Intelligence Lifecyclecited by 22
  30. 2026Evaluating AGENTS.md: Are Repository-Level Context Files Helpful for Coding Agents?cited by 19
  31. 2024WebSuite: Systematically Evaluating Why Web Agents Failcited by 16
  32. 2026GUI-GENESIS: Automated Synthesis of Efficient Environments with Verifiable Rewards for GUI Agent Post-Trainingcited by 16
  33. 2026Learning Personalized Agents from Human Feedbackcited by 16
  34. 2025Auto-Discovery-Bench: Diagnosing Structured State Tracking in Oracle-Guided Discoverycited by 15
  35. 2026ResearchGym: Evaluating Language Model Agents on Real-World AI Researchcited by 15
  36. 2026Persona2Web: Benchmarking Personalized Web Agents for Contextual Reasoning with User Historycited by 14
  37. 2026SciAgentGym: Benchmarking Multi-Step Scientific Tool-use in LLM Agentscited by 12
  38. 2025Code Benchmarks Should Prioritize Rigor, Reliability, and Reproducibilitycited by 10

50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Beyond Accuracy: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Evaluating Enterprise Agentic AI Systems
  2. 2025Towards a Standard, Enterprise-Relevant Agentic AI Benchmark: Lessons from 5.5 billion tokens' worth of agentic AI evaluations
  3. 2025Continuous Benchmark Generation for Evaluating Enterprise-scale LLM Agents
  4. 2026Beyond Static Leaderboards: Predictive Validity for the Evaluation of LLM Agents
  5. 2026Towards More Standardized AI Evaluation: From Models to Agents
  6. 2026StartupBench: Benchmarking General-Purpose Agents on Market-Validated End-to-End Workflows
  7. 2025Towards Outcome-Oriented, Task-Agnostic Evaluation of AI Agents
  8. 2025InnoGym: Benchmarking the Innovation Potential of AI Agents