Towards a Standard, Enterprise-Relevant Agentic AI Benchmark: Lessons from 5.5 billion tokens' worth of agentic AI evaluations
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Enterprise adoption of agentic AI systems requires reliable evaluation methods that reflect real-world deployment scenarios. Traditional LLM benchmarks suffer from training data contamination and fail to measure agentic capabilities such as multi-step tool use and decision-making under uncertainty. We present the Kamiwaza Agentic Merit Index (KAMI) v0.1, an enterprise-focused benchmark that addresses both contamination resistance and agentic evaluation. Through 170,000 LLM test items processing over 5.5 billion tokens across 35 model configurations, we demonstrate that traditional benchmark rankings poorly predict practical agentic performance. Notably, newer generation models like Llama 4 or Qwen 3 do not always outperform their older generation variants on enterprise-relevant tasks, contradicting traditional benchmark trends. We also present insights on cost-performance tradeoffs, model-specific behavioral patterns, and the impact of reasoning capabilities on token efficiency -- findings critical for enterprises making deployment decisions.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 10 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2025.
Builds on
10 of 23 references.
References · 10
- 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 558
- 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 533
- 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 340
- 2022Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitationcited by 234
- 2022Memorization Without Overfitting: Analyzing the Training Dynamics of Large Language Modelscited by 218
- 2024Benchmark Data Contamination of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 138
- 2020Question and Answer Test-Train Overlap in Open-Domain Question Answering Datasetscited by 137
- 2024Benchmarking Benchmark Leakage in Large Language Modelscited by 102
- 2023Revisiting Out-of-distribution Robustness in NLP: Benchmark, Analysis, and LLMs Evaluationscited by 96
- 2024Language model developers should report train-test overlapcited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026EnterpriseVal: Quantifying the Efficacy, Reliability and Value of Generative AI in the Enterprise18 Sep 2026
- 2026OneDayAgent: Towards a Long-Horizon Harness for Autonomous Agents4 Aug 2026
- 2026Evaluating Memory Condensation Strategies for Coding Agents in Data-Driven Scientific Discovery13 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Beyond Accuracy: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Evaluating Enterprise Agentic AI Systems
- 2025AgentArch: A Comprehensive Benchmark to Evaluate Agent Architectures in Enterprise
- 2025Continuous Benchmark Generation for Evaluating Enterprise-scale LLM Agents
- 2026AlphaEval: Evaluating Agents in Production
- 2026AI-NativeBench: An Open-Source White-Box Agentic Benchmark Suite for AI-Native Systems
- 2026AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World Contexts
- 2026StartupBench: Benchmarking General-Purpose Agents on Market-Validated End-to-End Workflows
- 2025Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey