Continuous Benchmark Generation for Evaluating Enterprise-scale LLM Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid adoption of AI agents across domains has made systematic evaluation crucial for ensuring their usefulness and successful production deployment. Evaluation of AI agents typically involves using a fixed set of benchmarks and computing multiple evaluation metrics for the agent. While sufficient for simple coding tasks, these benchmarks fall short for enterprise-scale agents, where services and requirements evolve continuously and ground-truth examples are sparse. We propose a process of benchmark generation that helps evolve the benchmarks as the requirements change and perform robust evaluation of evolving AI agents. We instantiate this approach for a case study of service migration from one deployment platform to another at a large public enterprise. Our approach relies on semi-structured documents where developers express the high-level intent, and uses state-of-the-art LLMs to generate benchmarks from just a small number of such documents. Overall, this process results in a maintainable evaluation framework, enabling rapid feedback on agent performance and facilitating targeted improvements.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 4 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2025.
Builds on
4 of 12 references.
References · 4
- 2024STaRK: Benchmarking LLM Retrieval on Textual and Relational Knowledge Basescited by 53
- 2025LogSage: An LLM-Based Framework for CI/CD Failure Detection and Remediation with Industrial Validationcited by 5
- 2024STACKFEED: Structured Textual Actor-Critic Knowledge Base Editing with FeedBackcited by 4
- 2025Intent-based System Design and Operationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Anchor: Mitigating Artifact Drift in Agent Benchmark Generationcited by 1
- 2026Running the Gauntlet: Challenging Agentic Taskscited by 0
- 2026EvalLoop: A Methodology for Evaluation-Driven Iterative Improvement of Business AI Systemscited by 0
- 2026What Could the Agent See at 19:05? Generating Temporal Enterprise Scenarios from Real Research and Replaying Them to Evaluate Agentscited by 0
- 2026What Could the Agent See at 19:05? Generating Temporal Enterprise Scenarios from Real Research and Replaying Them to Evaluate Agents2 Aug 2026
- 2026EvalLoop: A Methodology for Evaluation-Driven Iterative Improvement of Business AI Systems6 Jul 2026
- 2026Running the Gauntlet: Challenging Agentic Tasks12 Jun 2026
- 2026Anchor: Mitigating Artifact Drift in Agent Benchmark Generation25 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey
- 2025Towards a Standard, Enterprise-Relevant Agentic AI Benchmark: Lessons from 5.5 billion tokens' worth of agentic AI evaluations
- 2026AlphaEval: Evaluating Agents in Production
- 2025Beyond Accuracy: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Evaluating Enterprise Agentic AI Systems
- 2025Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents
- 2025Benchmarking and Studying the LLM-based Agent System in End-to-End Software Development
- 2026Efficient Benchmarking in Production: A Study of an Evolving LLM Agent
- 2024Evaluation-Driven Development and Operations of LLM Agents: A Process Model and Reference Architecture