InnoGym: Benchmarking the Innovation Potential of AI Agents
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
LLMs and Agents have achieved impressive progress in code generation, mathematical reasoning, and scientific discovery. However, existing benchmarks primarily measure correctness, overlooking the diversity of methods behind solutions. True innovation depends not only on producing correct answers but also on the originality of the approach. We present InnoGym, the first benchmark and framework designed to systematically evaluate the innovation potential of AI agents. InnoGym introduces two complementary metrics: performance gain, which measures improvement over the best-known solutions, and novelty, which captures methodological differences from prior approaches. The benchmark includes 18 carefully curated tasks from real-world engineering and scientific domains, each standardized through resource filtering, evaluator validation, and solution collection. In addition, we provide iGym, a unified execution environment for reproducible and long-horizon evaluations. Extensive experiments show that while some agents produce novel approaches, their lack of robustness limits performance gains. These results highlight a key gap between creativity and effectiveness, underscoring the need for benchmarks that evaluate both.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 27 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2025.
Builds on
27 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025EquiBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models' Reasoning about Program Semantics via Equivalence Checking18 Feb
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code12 Mar
Other references · 25
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,723
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
- 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 1,002
- 2020Neural Sparse Voxel Fieldscited by 959
- 2025AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discoverycited by 867
13 more
- 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challengescited by 769
- 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 469
- 2025Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientistcited by 401
- 2023MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentationcited by 366
- 2024LongRoPE: Extending LLM Context Window Beyond 2 Million Tokenscited by 313
- 2025AIDE: AI-Driven Exploration in the Space of Codecited by 226
- 2025DeepSeek-OCR: Contexts Optical Compressioncited by 183
- 2025MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agentscited by 124
- 2024Many Heads Are Better Than One: Improved Scientific Idea Generation by A LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systemcited by 68
- 2025DataSciBench: An LLM Agent Benchmark for Data Sciencecited by 57
- 2025Glyph: Scaling Context Windows via Visual-Text Compressioncited by 49
- 2025AI Idea Bench 2025: AI Research Idea Generation Benchmarkcited by 40
- 2025InnovatorBench: Evaluating Agents' Ability to Conduct Innovative LLM Researchcited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Can We Predict Before Executing Machine Learning Agents?cited by 10
- 2026EvoIdeator: Evolving Scientific Ideas through Checklist-Grounded Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
- 2026Can LLM Agents Discover? Evaluating Creativity on ML Engineering Taskscited by 1
- 2026When AI Designs AI: Innovation or Imitation?cited by 0
- 2026Can LLM Agents Discover? Evaluating Creativity on ML Engineering Tasks30 Aug 2026
- 2026When AI Designs AI: Innovation or Imitation?18 Aug 2026
- 2026EvoIdeator: Evolving Scientific Ideas through Checklist-Grounded Reinforcement Learning23 Mar 2026
- 2026Can We Predict Before Executing Machine Learning Agents?9 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026AgentIdeaBench: Benchmarking Scientific Ideation in the Agent Era
- 2026StartupBench: Benchmarking General-Purpose Agents on Market-Validated End-to-End Workflows
- 2026Benchmarking AI Agents for Addressing Scientific Challenges Across Scales
- 2026AlphaEval: Evaluating Agents in Production
- 2026ResearchGym: Evaluating Language Model Agents on Real-World AI Research
- 2026MLS-Bench: A Holistic and Rigorous Assessment of AI Systems on Building Better AI
- 2025Towards a Standard, Enterprise-Relevant Agentic AI Benchmark: Lessons from 5.5 billion tokens' worth of agentic AI evaluations
- 2025Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey