mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Toward an Evaluation Science for Generative AI Systems

arXiv 2503.05336 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2025cs.AI cs.LGcited by 45

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There is an increasing imperative to anticipate and understand the performance and safety of generative AI systems in real-world deployment contexts. However, the current evaluation ecosystem is insufficient: Commonly used static benchmarks face validity challenges, and ad hoc case-by-case audits rarely scale. In this piece, we advocate for maturing an evaluation science for generative AI systems. While generative AI creates unique challenges for system safety engineering and measurement science, the field can draw valuable insights from the development of safety evaluation practices in other fields, including transportation, aerospace, and pharmaceutical engineering. In particular, we present three key lessons: Evaluation metrics must be applicable to real-world performance, metrics must be iteratively refined, and evaluation institutions and norms must be established. Applying these insights, we outline a concrete path toward a more rigorous approach for evaluating generative AI systems.

Key facts. Cited by 45 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 100 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2025.

Builds on

38 of 100 references.

References · 38

  1. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  2. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  3. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
  4. 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
  5. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  6. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  7. 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 550
  8. 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 459
  9. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 384
  10. 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 349
  11. 2020Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning researchcited by 260
  12. 2024WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wildcited by 218
26 more
  1. 2021What Will it Take to Fix Benchmarking in Natural Language Understanding?cited by 203
  2. 2024A Careful Examination of Large Language Model Performance on Grade School Arithmeticcited by 191
  3. 2023Sociotechnical Safety Evaluation of Generative AI Systemscited by 157
  4. 2020Intrinsic Bias Metrics Do Not Correlate with Application Biascited by 148
  5. 2023Evaluating the Social Impact of Generative AI Systems in Systems and Societycited by 92
  6. 2022The Fallacy of AI Functionalitycited by 88
  7. 2024Open-Endedness is Essential for Artificial Superhuman Intelligencecited by 80
  8. 2024Clio: Privacy-Preserving Insights into Real-World AI Usecited by 72
  9. 2022Outsider Oversight: Designing a Third Party Audit Ecosystem for AI Governancecited by 67
  10. 2024HAICOSYSTEM: An Ecosystem for Sandboxing Safety Risks in Human-AI Interactionscited by 44
  11. 2024AI auditing: The Broken Bus on the Road to AI Accountabilitycited by 43
  12. 2020Towards Ecologically Valid Research on Language User Interfacescited by 42
  13. 2024Bias in Language Models: Beyond Trick Tests and Toward RUTEd Evaluationcited by 41
  14. 2024Benchmarks as Microscopes: A Call for Model Metrologycited by 35
  15. 2024How Beginning Programmers and Code LLMs (Mis)read Each Othercited by 31
  16. 2024Towards AI Accountability Infrastructure: Gaps and Opportunities in AI Audit Toolingcited by 29
  17. 2022From plane crashes to algorithmic harm: applicability of safety engineering frameworks for responsible MLcited by 27
  18. 2024Evaluating Generative AI Systems is a Social Science Measurement Challengecited by 23
  19. 2023Concrete Problems in AI Safety, Revisitedcited by 22
  20. 2022System Safety and Artificial Intelligencecited by 18
  21. 2019ABOUT ML: Annotation and Benchmarking on Understanding and Transparency of Machine Learning Lifecyclescited by 13
  22. 2023A Framework for Automated Measurement of Responsible AI Harms in Generative AI Applicationscited by 12
  23. 2024What's documented in AI? Systematic Analysis of 32K AI Model Cardscited by 11
  24. 2022Trustworthy Social Bias Measurementcited by 7
  25. 2024Do Responsible AI Artifacts Advance Stakeholder Goals? Four Key Barriers Perceived by Legal and Civil Stakeholderscited by 4
  26. 2024Legacy Procurement Practices Shape How U.S. Cities Govern AI: Understanding Government Employees' Practices, Challenges, and Needscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 20; 2026: 25.

45 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Measuring what Matters: Construct Validity in Large Language Model Benchmarkscited by 119
  2. 2025LLM Social Simulations Are a Promising Research Methodcited by 99
  3. 2025Correlated Errors in Large Language Modelscited by 45
  4. 2025The Case for "Thick Evaluations" of Cultural Representation in AIcited by 17
  5. 2025Train-before-Test Harmonizes Language Model Rankingscited by 12
  6. 2025HumanAgencyBench: Scalable Evaluation of Human Agency Support in AI Assistantscited by 11
  7. 2025STREAM (ChemBio): A Standard for Transparently Reporting Evaluations in AI Model Reportscited by 10
  8. 2025The Inadequacy of Offline LLM Evaluations: A Need to Account for Personalization in Model Behaviorcited by 8
  9. 2025Doubly-Robust LLM-as-a-Judge: Externally Valid Estimation with Imperfect Personascited by 8
  10. 2025Position: Stop Evaluating AI with Human Tests, Develop Principled, AI-specific Tests insteadcited by 7
  11. 2026ProcCtrlBench: Evaluating Process-Level Defects and Control Preservation in LLM Coding Agentscited by 6
  12. 2025Real-World Gaps in AI Governance Researchcited by 5
33 more
  1. 2025EvalCards: A Framework for Standardized Evaluation Reportingcited by 4
  2. 2026Evaluation Cards: An Interpretive Layer for AI Evaluation Reportingcited by 4
  3. 2026REDAgentBench: Executable Red Teaming and Faithful Measurement of LLM Agent Systemscited by 4
  4. 2025Benchmarks Are Not Atomic: Composition-Aware LLM Evaluation using BenchHubcited by 3
  5. 2025Limits of Safe AI Deployment: Differentiating Oversight and Controlcited by 3
  6. 2025AI for Scientific Discovery is a Social Problemcited by 3
  7. 2025NeurIPS should lead scientific consensus on AI policycited by 3
  8. 2026Agent Benchmarks Fail Public Sector Requirementscited by 3
  9. 2025Does Acceleration Cause Hidden Instability in Vision Language Models? Uncovering Instance-Level Divergence Through a Large-Scale Empirical Studycited by 2
  10. 2026Legal Infrastructure for Transformative AI Governancecited by 2
  11. 2026CIRCLE: A Framework for Evaluating AI from a Real-World Lenscited by 2
  12. 2025NeurIPS 2025 E2LM Competition : Early Training Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 1
  13. 2026Making AI Evaluation Deployment Relevant Through Context Specificationcited by 1
  14. 2026Learning from AVA: Early Lessons from a Curated and Trustworthy Generative AI for Policy and Development Researchcited by 1
  15. 2026AI-Assisted Systematization for Evaluating GenAI Systemscited by 1
  16. 2026What Current AI Benchmarks Leave Unmeasured: Modality, Search, Citations, and Implications (for Safety Evaluations)cited by 1
  17. 2026Rating the Raters: Rasch Measurement Theory for LLM Evaluationcited by 1
  18. 2026Ideation Arena: Evaluating LLM Generated Research Ideas with Battle-style Human Expert Assessmentcited by 1
  19. 2025A Conceptual Framework for AI Capability Evaluationscited by 0
  20. 2025Emergent evaluation hubs in a decentralizing large language model ecosystemcited by 0
  21. 2026Real-World AI Evaluation: How FRAME Generates Systematic Evidence to Resolve the Decision-Maker's Dilemmacited by 0
  22. 2026From Feelings to Metrics: Understanding and Formalizing How Users Vibe-Test LLMscited by 0
  23. 2026On Challenges in Evaluation Methodology: A Reviewcited by 0
  24. 2026Principles and Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in AI Evaluationcited by 0
  25. 2026BenCSSmark: Making the Social Sciences Count in LLM Researchcited by 0
  26. 2026From Controlled to the Wild: Evaluation of Pentesting Agents for the Real-Worldcited by 0
  27. 2026Pander Score: A Continuous Measure of Sycophancy as Epistemic Deferencecited by 0
  28. 2026HERO: Improving the Reliability and Sensitivity of Generative Model Evaluation Using Historical Datacited by 0
  29. 2026Exposure is not manifestation: measurement target and output resolution jointly determine which behavioural-faithfulness evaluator winscited by 0
  30. 2026Position: Reasoning is a Learnable Rule-Based Processcited by 0
  31. 2026One Capability or Many? Structural and Predictive Tests of Benchmark Validity Disagree About Economic Benchmarks for Frontier AIcited by 0
  32. 2026Efficient Test-Time Adaptation through Human-AI Interactioncited by 0
  33. 2026Silent Revision: Measuring Undisclosed Change in the Safety Frameworks of Frontier AI Developerscited by 0