mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HAICOSYSTEM: An Ecosystem for Sandboxing Safety Risks in Human-AI Interactions

arXiv 2409.16427 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2024cs.AIcited by 42

Not on the map. Why?

Cited by 30 in LLM agents and tool use, but placed by its own abstract, which didn’t fit.

Abstract (arXiv)

AI agents are increasingly autonomous in their interactions with human users and tools, leading to increased interactional safety risks. We present HAICOSYSTEM, a framework examining AI agent safety within diverse and complex social interactions. HAICOSYSTEM features a modular sandbox environment that simulates multi-turn interactions between human users and AI agents, where the AI agents are equipped with a variety of tools (e.g., patient management platforms) to navigate diverse scenarios (e.g., a user attempting to access other patients' profiles). To examine the safety of AI agents in these interactions, we develop a comprehensive multi-dimensional evaluation framework that uses metrics covering operational, content-related, societal, and legal risks. Through running 1840 simulations based on 92 scenarios across seven domains (e.g., healthcare, finance, education), we demonstrate that HAICOSYSTEM can emulate realistic user-AI interactions and complex tool use by AI agents. Our experiments show that state-of-the-art LLMs, both proprietary and open-sourced, exhibit safety risks in over 50% cases, with models generally showing higher risks when interacting with simulated malicious users. Our findings highlight the ongoing challenge of building agents that can safely navigate complex interactions, particularly when faced with malicious users. To foster the AI agent safety ecosystem, we release a code platform that allows practitioners to create custom scenarios, simulate interactions, and evaluate the safety and performance of their agents.

Key facts. Cited by 42 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 23; 2026: 16.

42 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agentscited by 280
  2. 2025X-Teaming: Multi-Turn Jailbreaks and Defenses with Adaptive Multi-Agentscited by 112
  3. 2025A Comprehensive Survey in LLM(-Agent) Full Stack Safety: Data, Training and Deploymentcited by 110
  4. 2024RedCode: Risky Code Execution and Generation Benchmark for Code Agentscited by 87
  5. 2025OpenAgentSafety: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Real-World AI Agent Safetycited by 71
  6. 2024Refusal-Trained LLMs Are Easily Jailbroken As Browser Agentscited by 61
  7. 2026Mind the Sim2Real Gap in User Simulation for Agentic Taskscited by 44
  8. 2025Toward an Evaluation Science for Generative AI Systemscited by 42
  9. 2025RedTeamCUA: Realistic Adversarial Testing of Computer-Use Agents in Hybrid Web-OS Environmentscited by 42
  10. 2025Ambig-SWE: Interactive Agents to Overcome Underspecificity in Software Engineeringcited by 28
  11. 2026Unsafer in Many Turns: Benchmarking and Defending Multi-Turn Safety Risks in Tool-Using Agentscited by 28
  12. 2025Multi-turn Evaluation of Anthropomorphic Behaviours in Large Language Modelscited by 25
30 more
  1. 2025A Survey on the Safety and Security Threats of Computer-Using Agents: JARVIS or Ultron?cited by 23
  2. 2025EmoAgent: Assessing and Safeguarding Human-AI Interaction for Mental Health Safetycited by 21
  3. 2025Think Twice Before You Act: Enhancing Agent Behavioral Safety with Thought Correctioncited by 14
  4. 2025SafeScientist: Toward Risk-Aware Scientific Discoveries by LLM Agentscited by 14
  5. 2025Generative Value Conflicts Reveal LLM Prioritiescited by 13
  6. 2025SOTOPIA-S4: a user-friendly system for flexible, customizable, and large-scale social simulationcited by 10
  7. 2025RedCodeAgent: Automatic Red-teaming Agent against Diverse Code Agentscited by 9
  8. 2025Measuring Harmfulness of Computer-Using Agentscited by 8
  9. 2026OdysSim: Building Foundation Models for Human Behavior Simulationcited by 8
  10. 2025TAI3: Testing Agent Integrity in Interpreting User Intentcited by 7
  11. 2025STAC: When Innocent Tools Form Dangerous Chains for LLM Agentscited by 5
  12. 2026Reinforcing Human Behavior Simulation via Verbal Feedbackcited by 4
  13. 2026You Told Me to Do It: Measuring Instructional Text-induced Private Data Leakage in LLM Agentscited by 3
  14. 2026ClawTrap: A MITM-Based Red-Teaming Framework for Real-World OpenClaw Security Evaluationcited by 3
  15. 2026BeSafe-Bench: Unveiling Behavioral Safety Risks of Situated Agents in Functional Environmentscited by 3
  16. 2026Interactive Evaluation Requires a Design Sciencecited by 3
  17. 2025Learning Efficient Guardrails for Compliancecited by 2
  18. 2025The Social Cost of Intelligence: Emergence, Propagation, and Amplification of Stereotypical Bias in Multi-Agent Systemscited by 2
  19. 2026FAVA: Formal Authorization for Verified Agents with Evidence-Backed Permission Graphscited by 2
  20. 2025Superalignment with Dynamic Human Valuescited by 1
  21. 2025Exploring the Secondary Risks of Large Language Modelscited by 1
  22. 2025Efficient On-Device Agents via Adaptive Context Managementcited by 1
  23. 2026Lattice: Generative Guardrails for Conversational Agentscited by 1
  24. 2026Isolation as a First-Class Principle for LLM-Agent System Safety: Concepts, Taxonomy, Challenges and Future Directionscited by 1
  25. 2025ASTRA: Agentic Steerability and Risk Assessment Frameworkcited by 0
  26. 2026Security Risks in Tool-Enabled AI Agents: A Systematic Analysis of Privileged Execution Environmentscited by 0
  27. 2026Hidden in Plain Sight: Benchmarking Agent Safety Against Decomposition Attacks with DECOMPBENCHcited by 0
  28. 2026On Understanding, Identifying, and Mitigating Vulnerabilities in Agentic Large Language Modelscited by 0
  29. 2026MATE: Policy-Aware Security Auditing for Mobile Agents via Synthesis-Driven Trajectory Learningcited by 0
  30. 2026WatchPoint: Executable User Feedback for Real-World Agentic Web Developmentcited by 0