mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

System Safety and Artificial Intelligence

arXiv 2202.09292 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2022eess.SY cs.AI cs.CYcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This chapter formulates seven lessons for preventing harm in artificial intelligence (AI) systems based on insights from the field of system safety for software-based automation in safety-critical domains. New applications of AI across societal domains and public organizations and infrastructures come with new hazards, which lead to new forms of harm, both grave and pernicious. The text addresses the lack of consensus for diagnosing and eliminating new AI system hazards. For decades, the field of system safety has dealt with accidents and harm in safety-critical systems governed by varying degrees of software-based automation and decision-making. This field embraces the core assumption of systems and control that AI systems cannot be safeguarded by technical design choices on the model or algorithm alone, instead requiring an end-to-end hazard analysis and design frame that includes the context of use, impacted stakeholders and the formal and informal institutional environment in which the system operates. Safety and other values are then inherently socio-technical and emergent system properties that require design and control measures to instantiate these across the technical, social and institutional components of a system. This chapter honors system safety pioneer Nancy Leveson, by situating her core lessons for today's AI system safety challenges. For every lesson, concrete tools are offered for rethinking and reorganizing the safety management of AI systems, both in design and governance. This history tells us that effective AI safety management requires transdisciplinary approaches and a shared language that allows involvement of all levels of society.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2022.

Builds on

7 of 48 references.

References · 7

  1. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
  2. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
  3. 2017A General Safety Framework for Learning-Based Control in Uncertain Robotic Systemscited by 150
  4. 2019Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AIcited by 134
  5. 2019The Hidden Assumptions Behind Counterfactual Explanations and Principal Reasonscited by 115
  6. 2021Hard Choices in Artificial Intelligencecited by 26
  7. 2018A Broader View on Bias in Automated Decision-Making: Reflecting on Epistemology and Dynamicscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 7; 2026: 3.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Auditing large language models: a three-layered approachcited by 135
  2. 2025Toward an Evaluation Science for Generative AI Systemscited by 42
  3. 2022From plane crashes to algorithmic harm: applicability of safety engineering frameworks for responsible MLcited by 26
  4. 2024Harm Amplification in Text-to-Image Modelscited by 14
  5. 2024The Responsible Foundation Model Development Cheatsheet: A Review of Tools & Resourcescited by 11
  6. 2024Responsible Reporting for Frontier AI Developmentcited by 10
  7. 2024AI Alignment through Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback? Contradictions and Limitationscited by 10
  8. 2025Trustless Autonomy: Understanding Motivations, Benefits, and Governance Dilemmas in Self-Sovereign Decentralized AI Agentscited by 10
  9. 2025Focus-N-Fix: Region-Aware Fine-Tuning for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 9
  10. 2025From Hazard Identification to Controller Design: Proactive and LLM-Supported Safety Engineering for ML-Powered Systemscited by 7
  11. 2025Formalising Human-in-the-Loop: Computational Reductions, Failure Modes, and Legal-Moral Responsibilitycited by 7
  12. 2022System Safety Engineering for Social and Ethical ML Risks: A Case Studycited by 2
6 more
  1. 2023Concrete Safety for ML Problems: System Safety for ML Development and Assessmentcited by 2
  2. 2025What Is AI Safety? What Do We Want It to Be?cited by 2
  3. 2026Clear, Compelling Arguments: Rethinking the Foundations of Frontier AI Safety Casescited by 1
  4. 2026From Use to Oversight: How Mental Models Influence User Behavior and Output in AI Writing Assistantscited by 1
  5. 2025From Data-Driven to Purpose-Driven Artificial Intelligence: Systems Thinking for Data-Analytic Automation of Patient Carecited by 0
  6. 2026Unsafe at any AUC: Unlearned Lessons from Sociotechnical Disasters for Responsible AIcited by 0