Making AI Evaluation Deployment Relevant Through Context Specification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With many organizations struggling to gain value from AI deployments, pressure to evaluate AI in an informed manner has intensified. Status quo AI evaluation approaches often mask the operational realities that ultimately determine deployment success, making it difficult for organizational decision makers to know whether and how AI tools will deliver durable value. We introduce and describe context specification as a process to support and inform this decision making process. Context specification turns diffuse stakeholder perspectives about what matters in a given setting into clear, named constructs: explicit definitions of the properties, behaviors, and outcomes that evaluations aim to capture, so they can be observed and measured in context. The process serves as a foundational roadmap for evaluating what AI systems are likely to do in the deployment contexts that organizations actually manage.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.
Builds on
18 of 36 references.
References · 18
- 2019Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Languagecited by 380
- 2019Measurement and Fairnesscited by 308
- 2025Measuring what Matters: Construct Validity in Large Language Model Benchmarkscited by 119
- 2023The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practicecited by 87
- 2025Position: Evaluating Generative AI Systems Is a Social Science Measurement Challengecited by 63
- 2025Measurement to Meaning: A Validity-Centered Framework for AI Evaluationcited by 57
- 2024Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrievalcited by 51
- 2025Toward an Evaluation Science for Generative AI Systemscited by 45
- 2025Reality Check: A New Evaluation Ecosystem Is Necessary to Understand AI's Real World Effectscited by 19
- 2024A Shared Standard for Valid Measurement of Generative AI Systems' Capabilities, Risks, and Impactscited by 13
- 2024Improving governance outcomes through AI documentation: Bridging theory and practicecited by 8
- 2025An Evaluation of Large Language Models on Text Summarization Tasks Using Prompt Engineering Techniquescited by 7
6 more
- 2026How Should AI Safety Benchmarks Benchmark Safety?cited by 5
- 2025Distinguishing Task-Specific and General-Purpose AI in Regulationcited by 3
- 2025On the Design and Evaluation of Human-centered Explainable AI Systems: A Systematic Review and Taxonomycited by 3
- 2025Exploring the Use of LLMs for Requirements Specification in an IT Consulting Companycited by 2
- 2024AI Sustainability in Practice Part One: Foundations for Sustainable AI Projectscited by 1
- 2024Generative AI Needs Adaptive Governancecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.