Trustworthy Social Bias Measurement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
How do we design measures of social bias that we trust? While prior work has introduced several measures, no measure has gained widespread trust: instead, mounting evidence argues we should distrust these measures. In this work, we design bias measures that warrant trust based on the cross-disciplinary theory of measurement modeling. To combat the frequently fuzzy treatment of social bias in NLP, we explicitly define social bias, grounded in principles drawn from social science research. We operationalize our definition by proposing a general bias measurement framework DivDist, which we use to instantiate 5 concrete bias measures. To validate our measures, we propose a rigorous testing protocol with 8 testing criteria (e.g. predictive validity: do measures predict biases in US employment?). Through our testing, we demonstrate considerable evidence to trust our measures, showing they overcome conceptual, technical, and empirical deficiencies present in prior measures.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 75 of its 134 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2022.
Builds on
75 of 134 references.
References · 75
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,388
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
38 more
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
- 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
- 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 807
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
- 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 703
- 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 683
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 608
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
- 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
- 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 481
- 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 466
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
- 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
- 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 410
- 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 397
- 2019Measurement and Fairnesscited by 299
- 2019Measuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 275
- 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
- 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
- 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 247
- 2021Quality at a Glance: An Audit of Web-Crawled Multilingual Datasetscited by 241
- 2018Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systemscited by 234
- 2016Diachronic Word Embeddings Reveal Statistical Laws of Semantic Changecited by 219
- 2019Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Modelscited by 214
- 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 204
- 2018Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddingscited by 169
- 2020Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biasescited by 167
- 2020Intrinsic Bias Metrics Do Not Correlate with Application Biascited by 148
- 2019Black is to Criminal as Caucasian is to Police: Detecting and Removing Multiclass Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 146
- 2020Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?cited by 144
- 2019Predictive Biases in Natural Language Processing Models: A Conceptual Framework and Overviewcited by 137
- 2019Assessing Social and Intersectional Biases in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 134
- 2018Assessing Gender Bias in Machine Translation -- A Case Study with Google Translatecited by 121
- 2020Image Representations Learned With Unsupervised Pre-Training Contain Human-like Biasescited by 107
50 most cited of 75 All 75 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2023Inseq: An Interpretability Toolkit for Sequence Generation Modelscited by 78
- 2025Toward an Evaluation Science for Generative AI Systemscited by 42
- 2024Identifying and Mitigating Social Bias Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 13
- 2025Understanding and Meeting Practitioner Needs When Measuring Representational Harms Caused by LLM-Based Systemscited by 3
- 2023Applying Standards to Advance Upstream & Downstream Ethics in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Design Theater: Evaluating the Gap Between User-Facing Design Reasoning and Implementation in Generative UI Toolscited by 0
- 2026Critical Acclaim Orientation in Large Language Models: Evidence from Film Preference Elicitationcited by 0
- 2026Critical Acclaim Orientation in Large Language Models: Evidence from Film Preference Elicitation7 Aug 2026
- 2026Design Theater: Evaluating the Gap Between User-Facing Design Reasoning and Implementation in Generative UI Tools24 Jul 2026
- 2025Understanding and Meeting Practitioner Needs When Measuring Representational Harms Caused by LLM-Based Systems4 Jun 2025
- 2025Toward an Evaluation Science for Generative AI Systems7 Mar 2025
- 2024Identifying and Mitigating Social Bias Knowledge in Language Models7 Aug 2024
- 2023Applying Standards to Advance Upstream & Downstream Ethics in Large Language Models6 Jun 2023
- 2023Inseq: An Interpretability Toolkit for Sequence Generation Models27 Feb 2023