On Challenges in Evaluation Methodology: A Review
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in language models have prompted a growing body of work that questions prevailing evaluation practices. However, many such critiques have already been discussed in natural language processing (NLP), a field with a long history of methodological reflection on evaluation. We conduct a scoping review spanning four decades and develop a taxonomy of 22 recurring concerns. For each concern, we examine how recently it was discussed in the reviewed literature and whether it receives explicit attention in institutional checklists, finding that some concerns have become less visible in literature and many lack coverage in these checklists. Our work provides an overview of the major concerns in evaluation methodology that have shaped the field and identifies potential targets for renewed investigation and field-level intervention by the research community.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 304 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.
Builds on
9 of 304 references.
References · 9
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 395
- 2025Measuring what Matters: Construct Validity in Large Language Model Benchmarkscited by 119
- 2021Reduced, Reused and Recycled: The Life of a Dataset in Machine Learning Researchcited by 102
- 2025The Leaderboard Illusioncited by 66
- 2025Position: Evaluating Generative AI Systems Is a Social Science Measurement Challengecited by 63
- 2025Toward an Evaluation Science for Generative AI Systemscited by 45
- 2025Lost in Benchmarks? Rethinking Large Language Model Benchmarking with Item Response Theorycited by 45
- 2025LLM-Evaluation Tropes: Perspectives on the Validity of LLM-Evaluationscited by 15
- 2025Are Domain Generalization Benchmarks with Accuracy on the Line Misspecified?cited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.