mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning in Markov Games with Adaptive Adversaries: Policy Regret, Fundamental Barriers, and Efficient Algorithms

arXiv 2411.00707 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.GTcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study learning in a dynamically evolving environment modeled as a Markov game between a learner and a strategic opponent that can adapt to the learner's strategies. While most existing works in Markov games focus on external regret as the learning objective, external regret becomes inadequate when the adversaries are adaptive. In this work, we focus on policy regret -- a counterfactual notion that aims to compete with the return that would have been attained if the learner had followed the best fixed sequence of policy, in hindsight. We show that if the opponent has unbounded memory or if it is non-stationary, then sample-efficient learning is not possible. For memory-bounded and stationary, we show that learning is still statistically hard if the set of feasible strategies for the learner is exponentially large. To guarantee learnability, we introduce a new notion of consistent adaptive adversaries, wherein, the adversary responds similarly to similar strategies of the learner. We provide algorithms that achieve √T policy regret against memory-bounded, stationary, and consistent adversaries.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2024.

Builds on

39 of 69 references.

References · 39

  1. 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,103
  2. 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 567
  3. 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 503
  4. 2019Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurriculacited by 313
  5. 2016Safe, Multi-Agent, Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 311
  6. 2018Human-level performance in first-person multiplayer games with population-based deep reinforcement learningcited by 264
  7. 2017DeepStack: Expert-Level Artificial Intelligence in No-Limit Pokercited by 233
  8. 2020FLAMBE: Structural Complexity and Representation Learning of Low Rank MDPscited by 233
  9. 2020Reward-Free Exploration for Reinforcement Learningcited by 177
  10. 2017Unifying PAC and Regret: Uniform PAC Bounds for Episodic Reinforcement Learningcited by 176
  11. 2021V-Learning -- A Simple, Efficient, Decentralized Algorithm for Multiagent RLcited by 114
  12. 2020Provable Self-Play Algorithms for Competitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 113
27 more
  1. 2020Near-Optimal Reinforcement Learning with Self-Playcited by 109
  2. 2020Episodic Reinforcement Learning in Finite MDPs: Minimax Lower Bounds Revisitedcited by 106
  3. 2020A Sharp Analysis of Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Self-Playcited by 105
  4. 2020Learning Zero-Sum Simultaneous-Move Markov Games Using Function Approximation and Correlated Equilibriumcited by 100
  5. 2020Game-Theoretic Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 94
  6. 2020The AI Economist: Improving Equality and Productivity with AI-Driven Tax Policiescited by 75
  7. 2021RL for Latent MDPs: Regret Guarantees and a Lower Boundcited by 70
  8. 2017Online Reinforcement Learning in Stochastic Gamescited by 67
  9. 2017Rotting Banditscited by 57
  10. 2015The Sample Complexity of Revenue Maximizationcited by 48
  11. 2021The Power of Exploiter: Provable Multi-Agent RL in Large State Spacescited by 48
  12. 2023Settling the Sample Complexity of Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 45
  13. 2013Bandits with Switching Costs: T^{2/3} Regretcited by 39
  14. 2014Complexity of Mechanism Designcited by 33
  15. 2022Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with loglog(T) Switching Costcited by 32
  16. 2022Learning Markov Games with Adversarial Opponents: Efficient Algorithms and Fundamental Limitscited by 17
  17. 2022Optimistic PAC Reinforcement Learning: the Instance-Dependent Viewcited by 17
  18. 2017Multi-armed Bandit Problems with Strategic Armscited by 16
  19. 2020Online learning with dynamics: A minimax perspectivecited by 8
  20. 2018Policy Regret in Repeated Gamescited by 7
  21. 2017Bandits with Movement Costs and Adaptive Pricingcited by 6
  22. 2017Multi-Armed Bandits with Metric Movement Costscited by 6
  23. 2021Addressing the Long-term Impact of ML Decisions via Policy Regretcited by 5
  24. 2021Online Markov Decision Processes with Non-oblivious Strategic Adversarycited by 3
  25. 2022Complete Policy Regret Bounds for Tallying Banditscited by 3
  26. 2023Congested Bandits: Optimal Routing via Short-term Resetscited by 3
  27. 2023Weighted Tallying Bandits: Overcoming Intractability via Repeated Exposure Optimalitycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

3 papers.