mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Temporal Fairness in Multiwinner Voting

arXiv 2312.04417 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2023cs.GT cs.AI econ.THcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multiwinner voting captures a wide variety of settings, from parliamentary elections in democratic systems to product placement in online shopping platforms. There is a large body of work dealing with axiomatic characterizations, computational complexity, and algorithmic analysis of multiwinner voting rules. Although many challenges remain, significant progress has been made in showing existence of fair and representative outcomes as well as efficient algorithmic solutions for many commonly studied settings. However, much of this work focuses on single-shot elections, even though in numerous real-world settings elections are held periodically and repeatedly. Hence, it is imperative to extend the study of multiwinner voting to temporal settings. Recently, there have been several efforts to address this challenge. However, these works are difficult to compare, as they model multi-period voting in very different ways. We propose a unified framework for studying temporal fairness in this domain, drawing connections with various existing bodies of work, and consolidating them within a general framework. We also identify gaps in existing literature, outline multiple opportunities for future work, and put forward a vision for the future of multiwinner voting in temporal settings.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2023.

Builds on

35 of 61 references.

References · 35

  1. 2014Justified Representation in Approval-Based Committee Votingcited by 42
  2. 2020Multi-Winner Voting with Approval Preferencescited by 37
  3. 2020Proportional Participatory Budgeting with Additive Utilitiescited by 37
  4. 2016Proportional Justified Representationcited by 25
  5. 2020Participatory Budgeting: Models and Approachescited by 23
  6. 2018Fair Allocation of Indivisible Public Goodscited by 22
  7. 2016Fair Public Decision Makingcited by 21
  8. 2019Proportionality and the Limits of Welfarismcited by 21
  9. 2015Properties of Multiwinner Voting Rulescited by 20
  10. 2019Online Fair Division: A Surveycited by 16
  11. 2014On the Computation of Fully Proportional Representationcited by 14
  12. 2021Phragm'en's Voting Methods and Justified Representationcited by 12
23 more
  1. 2014Computational Aspects of Multi-Winner Approval Votingcited by 11
  2. 2023The (Computational) Social Choice Take on Indivisible Participatory Budgetingcited by 11
  3. 2023Repeated Fair Allocation of Indivisible Itemscited by 11
  4. 2017Multiwinner Elections with Diversity Constraintscited by 10
  5. 2019Truthful Aggregation of Budget Proposalscited by 10
  6. 2022Online Approval Committee Electionscited by 9
  7. 2022Repeatedly Matching Items to Agents Fairly and Efficientlycited by 8
  8. 2015Structure in Dichotomous Preferencescited by 7
  9. 2020When Votes Change and Committees Should (Not)cited by 7
  10. 2020Almost Envy-free Repeated Matching in Two-sided Marketscited by 7
  11. 2023Settling the Score: Portioning with Cardinal Preferencescited by 6
  12. 2018Compounding of Wealth in Proof-of-Stake Cryptocurrenciescited by 4
  13. 2022Social Choice Around the Block: On the Computational Social Choice of Blockchaincited by 4
  14. 2022Resource Sharing Through Multi-Round Matchingscited by 4
  15. 2017Proportional Representation in Vote Streamscited by 3
  16. 2021Fairness over time in dynamic resource allocation with an application in Healthcarecited by 3
  17. 2021DiRe Committee : Diversity and Representation Constraints in Multiwinner Electionscited by 3
  18. 2023The Leximin Approach for a Sequence of Collective Decisionscited by 3
  19. 2020Line-Up Elections: Parallel Voting with Shared Candidate Poolcited by 2
  20. 2023Free-Riding in Multi-Issue Decisionscited by 2
  21. 2019A Mathematical Analysis of an Election System Proposed by Gottlob Fregecited by 1
  22. 2021Do the Rich Get Richer? Fairness Analysis for Blockchain Incentivescited by 1
  23. 2023As Time Goes By: Adding a Temporal Dimension Towards Resolving Delegations in Liquid Democracycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 7; 2026: 6.

14 papers.

Sort: