Temporal Panel Selection in Ongoing Citizens' Assemblies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Permanent citizens' assemblies are ongoing deliberative bodies composed of randomly selected citizens, organized into panels that rotate over time. Unlike one-off panels, which represent the population in a single snapshot, permanent assemblies enable shifting participation across multiple rounds. This structure offers a powerful framework for ensuring that different groups of individuals are represented over time across successive panels. In particular, it allows smaller groups of individuals that may not warrant representation in every individual panel to be represented across a sequence of them. We formalize this temporal sortition framework by requiring proportional representation both within each individual panel and across the sequence of panels. Building on the work of Ebadian and Micha (2025), we consider a setting in which the population lies in a metric space, and the goal is to achieve both proportional representation, ensuring that every group of citizens receives adequate representation, and individual fairness, ensuring that each individual has an equal probability of being selected. We extend the notion of representation to a temporal setting by requiring that every initial segment of the panel sequence, viewed as a cumulative whole, proportionally reflects the structure of the population. We present algorithms that provide varying guarantees of proportional representation, both within individual panels and across any sequence of panels, while also maintaining individual fairness over time.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2026.
Builds on
19 of 34 references.
References · 19
- 2019Proportionally Fair Clusteringcited by 69
- 2014Justified Representation in Approval-Based Committee Votingcited by 42
- 2023Temporal Fairness in Multiwinner Votingcited by 14
- 2023Proportional Fairness in Clustering: A Social Choice Perspectivecited by 12
- 2023Repeated Fair Allocation of Indivisible Itemscited by 11
- 2022Online Approval Committee Electionscited by 9
- 2025Verifying Proportionality in Temporal Votingcited by 9
- 2022Repeatedly Matching Items to Agents Fairly and Efficientlycited by 8
- 2023Proportionally Representative Clusteringcited by 8
- 2020Neutralizing Self-Selection Bias in Sampling for Sortitioncited by 7
- 2020Almost Envy-free Repeated Matching in Two-sided Marketscited by 7
- 2024Boosting Sortition via Proportional Representationcited by 5
7 more
- 2022Resource Sharing Through Multi-Round Matchingscited by 4
- 2023Proportional Representation in Metric Spaces and Low-Distortion Committee Selectioncited by 3
- 2017Temporal Hierarchical Clusteringcited by 2
- 2024Federated Assembliescited by 2
- 2024Fair, Manipulation-Robust, and Transparent Sortitioncited by 2
- 2017Temporal Clusteringcited by 1
- 2024Can a Few Decide for Many? The Metric Distortion of Sortitioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.