Strengthening Full Justified Representation: Efficient Verification and Computation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Full justified representation (FJR) is among the strongest known satisfiable proportionality axioms for approval-based committee elections. Recent work has shown that an FJR committee can be found in polynomial time, but verifying whether a given committee satisfies FJR remains coNP-complete. We introduce FJR+, a strict strengthening of FJR and EJR+ that can be verified and satisfied in polynomial time. We then analyze the Residual-Budget Greedy (RBG) algorithm and prove that it selects a partial committee such that every size-k completion satisfies FJR+. This freedom allows us to use sequential Phragm'en to obtain a priceable completion. The resulting rule always satisfies FJR+ and the sub-core, and it is priceable whenever at least k candidates receive an approval. We also obtain a Droop-quota version of FJR+. Finally, we extend FJR+ to approval-based participatory budgeting with arbitrary project costs. A project-specific version of RBG computes this property in polynomial time and can be continued to a priceable outcome satisfying a cost-based version of the sub-core.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.
Builds on
28 of 32 references.
References · 28
- 2014Justified Representation in Approval-Based Committee Votingcited by 42
- 2020Proportional Participatory Budgeting with Additive Utilitiescited by 37
- 2016Proportional Justified Representationcited by 25
- 2023Robust and Verifiable Proportionality Axioms for Multiwinner Votingcited by 23
- 2019Proportionality and the Limits of Welfarismcited by 21
- 2023Proportional Aggregation of Preferences for Sequential Decision Makingcited by 17
- 2016The Core of the Participatory Budgeting Problemcited by 14
- 2023Temporal Fairness in Multiwinner Votingcited by 14
- 2021Phragm'en's Voting Methods and Justified Representationcited by 12
- 2024Temporal Elections: Welfare, Strategyproofness, and Proportionalitycited by 11
- 2016Proportional Rankingscited by 10
- 2025Verifying Proportionality in Temporal Votingcited by 9
16 more
- 2025Strengthening Proportionality in Temporal Votingcited by 9
- 2025Not in My Backyard! Temporal Voting Over Public Chorescited by 6
- 2016Multiwinner Approval Rules as Apportionment Methodscited by 5
- 2023Proportionality in Approval-Based Participatory Budgetingcited by 5
- 2023Completing Priceable Committees: Utilitarian and Representation Guarantees for Proportional Multiwinner Votingcited by 5
- 2025Full Proportional Justified Representationcited by 3
- 2026The Price of Proportional Representation in Temporal Votingcited by 3
- 2024Fair Lotteries for Participatory Budgetingcited by 2
- 2024Maximum Flow is Fair: A Network Flow Approach to Committee Votingcited by 2
- 2022Auditing for Core Stability in Participatory Budgetingcited by 1
- 2023Best-of-Both-Worlds Fairness in Committee Votingcited by 1
- 2023An Adaptive and Verifiably Proportional Method for Participatory Budgetingcited by 1
- 2025Justified Representation: From Hare to Droopcited by 1
- 2026An Axiomatic Analysis of Proportionality Notions in Approval-Based Multiwinner Votingcited by 1
- 2026A Polynomial-Time Rule Satisfying Full Justified Representationcited by 1
- 2026Full Justified Representation under Hare and Droop Quotas in Polynomial Timecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.