Almost Envy-free Repeated Matching in Two-sided Markets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A two-sided market consists of two sets of agents, each of whom have preferences over the other (Airbnb, Upwork, Lyft, Uber, etc.). We propose and analyze a repeated matching problem, where some set of matches occur on each time step, and our goal is to ensure fairness with respect to the cumulative allocations over an infinite time horizon. Our main result is a polynomial-time algorithm for additive, symmetric (vi(j) = vj(i)), and binary (vi(j) ∈ a,1) valuations that both (1) guarantees "envy-freeness up to a single match" (EF1) and (2) selects a maximum weight matching on each time step. Thus for this class of valuations, fairness can be achieved without sacrificing economic efficiency. This result holds even for "dynamic valuations", i.e., valuations that change over time. Although symmetry is a strong assumption, we show that this result cannot be extended to asymmetric binary valuations: (1) and (2) together are impossible even when valuations do not change over time, and for dynamic valuations, even (1) alone is impossible. To our knowledge, this is the first analysis of envy-freeness in a repeated matching setting.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023Temporal Fairness in Multiwinner Votingcited by 14
- 2021Two-Sided Matching Meets Fair Divisioncited by 5
- 2022Resource Sharing Through Multi-Round Matchingscited by 4
- 2024Automating Food Drop: The Power of Two Choices for Dynamic and Fair Food Allocationcited by 3
- 2024Promoting Two-sided Fairness in Dynamic Vehicle Routing Problemcited by 2
- 2025Fairness in Repeated Matching: A Maximin Perspectivecited by 2
- 2026Temporal Panel Selection in Ongoing Citizens' Assembliescited by 0
- 2026Temporal Panel Selection in Ongoing Citizens' Assemblies18 Feb 2026
- 2025Fairness in Repeated Matching: A Maximin Perspective6 Oct 2025
- 2024Automating Food Drop: The Power of Two Choices for Dynamic and Fair Food Allocation10 Jun 2024
- 2024Promoting Two-sided Fairness in Dynamic Vehicle Routing Problem29 May 2024
- 2023Temporal Fairness in Multiwinner Voting7 Dec 2023
- 2022Resource Sharing Through Multi-Round Matchings30 Nov 2022
- 2021Two-Sided Matching Meets Fair Division15 Jul 2021