Decentralized Optimistic Hyperpolicy Mirror Descent: Provably No-Regret Learning in Markov Games
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study decentralized policy learning in Markov games where we control a single agent to play with nonstationary and possibly adversarial opponents. Our goal is to develop a no-regret online learning algorithm that (i) takes actions based on the local information observed by the agent and (ii) is able to find the best policy in hindsight. For such a problem, the nonstationary state transitions due to the varying opponent pose a significant challenge. In light of a recent hardness result citepliu2022learning, we focus on the setting where the opponent's previous policies are revealed to the agent for decision making. With such an information structure, we propose a new algorithm, underlineDecentralized underlineOptimistic hypeunderlineRpolicy munderlineIrror deunderlineScent (DORIS), which achieves √K-regret in the context of general function approximation, where K is the number of episodes. Moreover, when all the agents adopt DORIS, we prove that their mixture policy constitutes an approximate coarse correlated equilibrium. In particular, DORIS maintains a textithyperpolicy which is a distribution over the policy space. The hyperpolicy is updated via mirror descent, where the update direction is obtained by an optimistic variant of least-squares policy evaluation. Furthermore, to illustrate the power of our method, we apply DORIS to constrained and vector-valued MDPs, which can be formulated as zero-sum Markov games with a fictitious opponent.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2022.
Builds on
36 of 59 references.
References · 36
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
- 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
- 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 555
- 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 500
- 2016Safe, Multi-Agent, Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 301
- 2016Contextual Decision Processes with Low Bellman Rank are PAC-Learnablecited by 290
- 2021Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 267
- 2021Bellman Eluder Dimension: New Rich Classes of RL Problems, and Sample-Efficient Algorithmscited by 222
- 2021Bilinear Classes: A Structural Framework for Provable Generalization in RLcited by 176
- 2018A Survey and Critique of Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 173
24 more
- 2020Exploration-Exploitation in Constrained MDPscited by 146
- 2019Constrained Reinforcement Learning Has Zero Duality Gapcited by 144
- 2020Provably Efficient Safe Exploration via Primal-Dual Policy Optimizationcited by 131
- 2021Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation Under Adaptivity Constraintscited by 124
- 2020Provable Self-Play Algorithms for Competitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 112
- 2019Optimism in Reinforcement Learning with Generalized Linear Function Approximationcited by 111
- 2021V-Learning -- A Simple, Efficient, Decentralized Algorithm for Multiagent RLcited by 111
- 2020Near-Optimal Reinforcement Learning with Self-Playcited by 108
- 2020Learning Zero-Sum Simultaneous-Move Markov Games Using Function Approximation and Correlated Equilibriumcited by 100
- 2021Independent Policy Gradient Methods for Competitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 97
- 2021Global Convergence of Multi-Agent Policy Gradient in Markov Potential Gamescited by 89
- 2021Learning Policies with Zero or Bounded Constraint Violation for Constrained MDPscited by 78
- 2017Online Reinforcement Learning in Stochastic Gamescited by 67
- 2021Last-iterate Convergence of Decentralized Optimistic Gradient Descent/Ascent in Infinite-horizon Competitive Markov Gamescited by 66
- 2019Reinforcement Learning with Convex Constraintscited by 57
- 2022Independent Policy Gradient for Large-Scale Markov Potential Games: Sharper Rates, Function Approximation, and Game-Agnostic Convergencecited by 54
- 2021Decentralized Q-Learning in Zero-sum Markov Gamescited by 53
- 2021The Power of Exploiter: Provable Multi-Agent RL in Large State Spacescited by 48
- 2021Towards General Function Approximation in Zero-Sum Markov Gamescited by 42
- 2021On Improving Model-Free Algorithms for Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
- 2021A Simple Reward-free Approach to Constrained Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
- 2021Provably Efficient Algorithms for Multi-Objective Competitive RLcited by 20
- 2021A Provably-Efficient Model-Free Algorithm for Constrained Markov Decision Processescited by 17
- 2022Learning Markov Games with Adversarial Opponents: Efficient Algorithms and Fundamental Limitscited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 5; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2023Breaking the Curse of Multiagency: Provably Efficient Decentralized Multi-Agent RL with Function Approximationcited by 29
- 2022Regret Minimization and Convergence to Equilibria in General-sum Markov Gamescited by 22
- 2022Strategic Decision-Making in the Presence of Information Asymmetry: Provably Efficient RL with Algorithmic Instrumentscited by 9
- 2023Hardness of Independent Learning and Sparse Equilibrium Computation in Markov Gamescited by 9
- 2025Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning with Max-Min Criterion: A Game-Theoretic Approachcited by 5
- 2024Refined Sample Complexity for Markov Games with Independent Linear Function Approximationcited by 3
- 2023Posterior Sampling for Competitive RL: Function Approximation and Partial Observationcited by 2
- 2023Sample-Efficient Multi-Agent RL: An Optimization Perspectivecited by 1
- 2023Improving Sample Efficiency of Model-Free Algorithms for Zero-Sum Markov Gamescited by 0
- 2026Cooperative Multi-agent RL with Communication Constraintscited by 0
- 2026Taming the Curses of Multiagency in Robust Markov Games with Large State Space through Linear Function Approximationcited by 0
- 2026Taming the Curses of Multiagency in Robust Markov Games with Large State Space through Linear Function Approximation4 May 2026
- 2026Cooperative Multi-agent RL with Communication Constraints18 Jan 2026
- 2025Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning with Max-Min Criterion: A Game-Theoretic Approach23 Oct 2025
- 2024Refined Sample Complexity for Markov Games with Independent Linear Function Approximation11 Feb 2024
- 2023Posterior Sampling for Competitive RL: Function Approximation and Partial Observation30 Oct 2023
- 2023Sample-Efficient Multi-Agent RL: An Optimization Perspective10 Oct 2023
- 2023Improving Sample Efficiency of Model-Free Algorithms for Zero-Sum Markov Games17 Aug 2023
- 2023Hardness of Independent Learning and Sparse Equilibrium Computation in Markov Games22 Mar 2023
- 2023Breaking the Curse of Multiagency: Provably Efficient Decentralized Multi-Agent RL with Function Approximation13 Feb 2023
- 2022Strategic Decision-Making in the Presence of Information Asymmetry: Provably Efficient RL with Algorithmic Instruments23 Aug 2022
- 2022Regret Minimization and Convergence to Equilibria in General-sum Markov Games28 Jul 2022