mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Navigating Fairness: Practitioners' Understanding, Challenges, and Strategies in AI/ML Development

arXiv 2403.15481 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2024cs.CY cs.AI cs.SEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rise in the use of AI/ML applications across industries has sparked more discussions about the fairness of AI/ML in recent times. While prior research on the fairness of AI/ML exists, there is a lack of empirical studies focused on understanding the perspectives and experiences of AI practitioners in developing a fair AI/ML system. Understanding AI practitioners' perspectives and experiences on the fairness of AI/ML systems are important because they are directly involved in its development and deployment and their insights can offer valuable real-world perspectives on the challenges associated with ensuring fairness in AI/ML systems. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 AI practitioners to investigate their understanding of what a 'fair AI/ML' is, the challenges they face in developing a fair AI/ML system, the consequences of developing an unfair AI/ML system, and the strategies they employ to ensure AI/ML system fairness. We developed a framework showcasing the relationship between AI practitioners' understanding of 'fair AI/ML' system and (i) their challenges in its development, (ii) the consequences of developing an unfair AI/ML system, and (iii) strategies used to ensure AI/ML system fairness. By exploring AI practitioners' perspectives and experiences, this study provides actionable insights to enhance AI/ML fairness, which may promote fairer systems, reduce bias, and foster public trust in AI technologies. Additionally, we also identify areas for further investigation and offer recommendations to aid AI practitioners and AI companies in navigating fairness.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2024.

Builds on

21 of 82 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  2. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  3. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
  4. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  5. 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
  6. 2017Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophycited by 148
  7. 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 139
  8. 2018Assessing Gender Bias in Machine Translation -- A Case Study with Google Translatecited by 121
  9. 201850 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learningcited by 101
  10. 2018Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Makingcited by 66
  11. 2021Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners' Processes, Challenges, and Needs for Supportcited by 61
  12. 2019Mathematical Notions vs. Human Perception of Fairness: A Descriptive Approach to Fairness for Machine Learningcited by 57
9 more
  1. 2022Exploring How Machine Learning Practitioners (Try To) Use Fairness Toolkitscited by 33
  2. 2019Explaining Models: An Empirical Study of How Explanations Impact Fairness Judgmentcited by 31
  3. 2020Sampling in Software Engineering Research: A Critical Review and Guidelinescited by 23
  4. 2020LiFT: A Scalable Framework for Measuring Fairness in ML Applicationscited by 22
  5. 2021Machine Learning Practices Outside Big Tech: How Resource Constraints Challenge Responsible Developmentcited by 21
  6. 2021Fair Enough: Searching for Sufficient Measures of Fairnesscited by 14
  7. 2021Socio-Technical Grounded Theory for Software Engineeringcited by 7
  8. 2023Ethics in the Age of AI: An Analysis of AI Practitioners' Awareness and Challengescited by 6
  9. 2024Analysing and Organising Human Communications for AI Fairness-Related Decisions: Use Cases from the Public Sectorcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.