mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Between Subjectivity and Imposition: Power Dynamics in Data Annotation for Computer Vision

arXiv 2007.14886 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2020cs.HC cs.CV cs.LGcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The interpretation of data is fundamental to machine learning. This paper investigates practices of image data annotation as performed in industrial contexts. We define data annotation as a sense-making practice, where annotators assign meaning to data through the use of labels. Previous human-centered investigations have largely focused on annotators subjectivity as a major cause for biased labels. We propose a wider view on this issue: guided by constructivist grounded theory, we conducted several weeks of fieldwork at two annotation companies. We analyzed which structures, power relations, and naturalized impositions shape the interpretation of data. Our results show that the work of annotators is profoundly informed by the interests, values, and priorities of other actors above their station. Arbitrary classifications are vertically imposed on annotators, and through them, on data. This imposition is largely naturalized. Assigning meaning to data is often presented as a technical matter. This paper shows it is, in fact, an exercise of power with multiple implications for individuals and society.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 6; 2023: 8; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

25 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practicecited by 86
  2. 2021A Survey on Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 84
  3. 2021Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners' Processes, Challenges, and Needs for Supportcited by 61
  4. 2022CrowdWorkSheets: Accounting for Individual and Collective Identities Underlying Crowdsourced Dataset Annotationcited by 59
  5. 2021The Who in XAI: How AI Background Shapes Perceptions of AI Explanationscited by 48
  6. 2022Towards Transparency in Dermatology Image Datasets with Skin Tone Annotations by Experts, Crowds, and an Algorithmcited by 35
  7. 2022Exploring How Machine Learning Practitioners (Try To) Use Fairness Toolkitscited by 33
  8. 2024Participation in the age of foundation modelscited by 32
  9. 2022Understanding Machine Learning Practitioners' Data Documentation Perceptions, Needs, Challenges, and Desideratacited by 28
  10. 2024Farsight: Fostering Responsible AI Awareness During AI Application Prototypingcited by 28
  11. 2023Disentangling Perceptions of Offensiveness: Cultural and Moral Correlatescited by 26
  12. 2024Plurals: A System for Guiding LLMs Via Simulated Social Ensemblescited by 17
13 more
  1. 2022The Data-Production Dispositifcited by 16
  2. 2021Computer Vision and Conflicting Values: Describing People with Automated Alt Textcited by 14
  3. 2021Studying Up Machine Learning Data: Why Talk About Bias When We Mean Power?cited by 11
  4. 2023Ground Truth Or Dare: Factors Affecting The Creation Of Medical Datasets For Training AIcited by 11
  5. 2022Subverting machines, fluctuating identities: Re-learning human categorizationcited by 10
  6. 2023Racial Bias within Face Recognition: A Surveycited by 9
  7. 2023Toward Operationalizing Pipeline-aware ML Fairness: A Research Agenda for Developing Practical Guidelines and Toolscited by 7
  8. 2023A Survey on Image-text Multimodal Modelscited by 4
  9. 2021Wisdom for the Crowd: Discoursive Power in Annotation Instructions for Computer Visioncited by 2
  10. 2023Unraveling the Interconnected Axes of Heterogeneity in Machine Learning for Democratic and Inclusive Advancementscited by 2
  11. 2023Making Data Work Countcited by 2
  12. 2026The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotationcited by 1
  13. 2026Red Teaming LLMs as Socio-Technical Practice: From Exploration and Data Creation to Evaluationcited by 0