From Paper to Card: Transforming Design Implications with Generative AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Communicating design implications is common within the HCI community when publishing academic papers, yet these papers are rarely read and used by designers. One solution is to use design cards as a form of translational resource that communicates valuable insights from papers in a more digestible and accessible format to assist in design processes. However, creating design cards can be time-consuming, and authors may lack the resources/know-how to produce cards. Through an iterative design process, we built a system that helps create design cards from academic papers using an LLM and text-to-image model. Our evaluation with designers (N=21) and authors of selected papers (N=12) revealed that designers perceived the design implications from our design cards as more inspiring and generative, compared to reading original paper texts, and the authors viewed our system as an effective way of communicating their design implications. We also propose future enhancements for AI-generated design cards.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2024.
Builds on
14 of 72 references.
References · 14
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2022An Image is Worth One Word: Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation using Textual Inversioncited by 2,231
- 2020TLDR: Extreme Summarization of Scientific Documentscited by 136
- 2020Multi-XScience: A Large-scale Dataset for Extreme Multi-document Summarization of Scientific Articlescited by 96
- 2021MS2: Multi-Document Summarization of Medical Studiescited by 80
- 2021DOC2PPT: Automatic Presentation Slides Generation from Scientific Documentscited by 68
- 2023Large Language Models are Diverse Role-Players for Summarization Evaluationcited by 62
- 2022Large-scale Text-to-Image Generation Models for Visual Artists' Creative Workscited by 60
- 2022Generated Faces in the Wild: Quantitative Comparison of Stable Diffusion, Midjourney and DALL-E 2cited by 55
- 2022Exploring How Machine Learning Practitioners (Try To) Use Fairness Toolkitscited by 33
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
6 papers.
- 2025Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 16
- 2025PosterMate: Audience-driven Collaborative Persona Agents for Poster Designcited by 9
- 2026PaperX: A Unified Framework for Multimodal Academic Presentation Generation with Scholar DAGcited by 3
- 2026Exploring Learners' Expectations and Engagement When Collaborating with Constructively Controversial Peer Agentscited by 0
- 2026PaperTok: Exploring the Use of Generative AI for Creating Short-form Videos for Research Communicationcited by 0
- 2026ReFinE: Streamlining UI Mockup Iteration with Research Findingscited by 0
- 2026ReFinE: Streamlining UI Mockup Iteration with Research Findings6 Apr 2026
- 2026PaperX: A Unified Framework for Multimodal Academic Presentation Generation with Scholar DAG30 Jan 2026
- 2026PaperTok: Exploring the Use of Generative AI for Creating Short-form Videos for Research Communication26 Jan 2026
- 2026Exploring Learners' Expectations and Engagement When Collaborating with Constructively Controversial Peer Agents20 Jan 2026
- 2025PosterMate: Audience-driven Collaborative Persona Agents for Poster Design24 Jul 2025
- 2025Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Review22 Jan 2025