mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Measurement as Bricolage: Examining How Data Scientists Construct Target Variables for Predictive Modeling Tasks

arXiv 2507.02819 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2025cs.HC cs.CY cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data scientists often formulate predictive modeling tasks involving fuzzy, hard-to-define concepts, such as the "authenticity" of student writing or the "healthcare need" of a patient. Yet the process by which data scientists translate fuzzy concepts into a concrete, proxy target variable remains poorly understood. We interview fifteen data scientists in education (N=8) and healthcare (N=7) to understand how they construct target variables for predictive modeling tasks. Our findings suggest that data scientists construct target variables through a bricolage process, in which they use creative and pragmatic approaches to make do with the limited data at hand. Data scientists attempt to satisfy five major criteria for a target variable through bricolage: validity, simplicity, predictability, portability, and resource requirements. To achieve this, data scientists adaptively apply problem (re)formulation strategies, such as swapping out one candidate target variable for another when the first fails to meet certain criteria (e.g., predictability), or composing multiple outcomes into a single target variable to capture a more holistic set of modeling objectives. Based on our findings, we present opportunities for future HCI, CSCW, and ML research to better support the art and science of target variable construction.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 151 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2025.

Builds on

58 of 151 references.

References · 58

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  3. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,190
  4. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  5. 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 349
  6. 2019Measurement and Fairnesscited by 308
  7. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  8. 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
  9. 2022Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AIcited by 171
  10. 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 147
  11. 2024Who Validates the Validators? Aligning LLM-Assisted Evaluation of LLM Outputs with Human Preferencescited by 144
  12. 2020DoWhy: An End-to-End Library for Causal Inferencecited by 95
38 more
  1. 2019FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learningcited by 93
  2. 2022The Fallacy of AI Functionalitycited by 88
  3. 2019Problem Formulation and Fairnesscited by 85
  4. 2023Fairlearn: Assessing and Improving Fairness of AI Systemscited by 74
  5. 2022Is Your Toxicity My Toxicity? Exploring the Impact of Rater Identity on Toxicity Annotationcited by 69
  6. 2020How do Data Science Workers Collaborate? Roles, Workflows, and Toolscited by 64
  7. 2019FairSight: Visual Analytics for Fairness in Decision Makingcited by 59
  8. 2021Collaboration Challenges in Building ML-Enabled Systems: Communication, Documentation, Engineering, and Processcited by 56
  9. 2022Improving Human-AI Partnerships in Child Welfare: Understanding Worker Practices, Challenges, and Desires for Algorithmic Decision Supportcited by 39
  10. 2025Medical Large Language Model Benchmarks Should Prioritize Construct Validitycited by 38
  11. 2024Human-Centered Design Recommendations for LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 37
  12. 2022Exploring How Machine Learning Practitioners (Try To) Use Fairness Toolkitscited by 34
  13. 2023Zeno: An Interactive Framework for Behavioral Evaluation of Machine Learningcited by 33
  14. 2020Dataset Discovery in Data Lakescited by 31
  15. 2021Benchmarking emergency department triage prediction models with machine learning and large public electronic health recordscited by 31
  16. 2019How Data Scientists Work Together With Domain Experts in Scientific Collaborations: To Find The Right Answer Or To Ask The Right Question?cited by 30
  17. 2022A Validity Perspective on Evaluating the Justified Use of Data-driven Decision-making Algorithmscited by 30
  18. 2021What are you optimizing for? Aligning Recommender Systems with Human Valuescited by 29
  19. 2023Understanding Frontline Workers' and Unhoused Individuals' Perspectives on AI Used in Homeless Servicescited by 29
  20. 2024ECBD: Evidence-Centered Benchmark Design for NLPcited by 28
  21. 2023Ground(less) Truth: A Causal Framework for Proxy Labels in Human-Algorithm Decision-Makingcited by 25
  22. 2024Evaluating Generative AI Systems is a Social Science Measurement Challengecited by 23
  23. 2020From Optimizing Engagement to Measuring Valuecited by 21
  24. 2021Increasing the Speed and Accuracy of Data LabelingThrough an AI Assisted Interfacecited by 21
  25. 2024The Situate AI Guidebook: Co-Designing a Toolkit to Support Multi-Stakeholder Early-stage Deliberations Around Public Sector AI Proposalscited by 15
  26. 2025Prompting in the Dark: Assessing Human Performance in Prompt Engineering for Data Labeling When Gold Labels Are Absentcited by 15
  27. 2024EXMOS: Explanatory Model Steering Through Multifaceted Explanations and Data Configurationscited by 14
  28. 2019Goals, Process, and Challenges of Exploratory Data Analysis: An Interview Studycited by 11
  29. 2023Multi-Target Multiplicity: Flexibility and Fairness in Target Specification under Resource Constraintscited by 11
  30. 2021Orienting, Framing, Bridging, Magic, and Counseling: How Data Scientists Navigate the Outer Loop of Client Collaborations in Industry and Academiacited by 10
  31. 2023Counterfactual Prediction Under Outcome Measurement Errorcited by 10
  32. 2024Are We Asking the Right Questions?: Designing for Community Stakeholders' Interactions with AI in Policingcited by 10
  33. 2025AI Mismatches: Identifying Potential Algorithmic Harms Before AI Developmentcited by 10
  34. 2023Judgment Sieve: Reducing Uncertainty in Group Judgments through Interventions Targeting Ambiguity versus Disagreementcited by 8
  35. 2023An Empirical Analysis of Racial Categories in the Algorithmic Fairness Literaturecited by 8
  36. 2024Designing Staged Evaluation Workflows for LLMs: Integrating Domain Experts, Lay Users, and Model-Generated Evaluation Criteriacited by 8
  37. 2021Hypothesis Formalization: Empirical Findings, Software Limitations, and Design Implicationscited by 7
  38. 2025Tempo: Helping Data Scientists and Domain Experts Collaboratively Specify Predictive Modeling Taskscited by 6

50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.