mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Everyday algorithm auditing: Understanding the power of everyday users in surfacing harmful algorithmic behaviors

arXiv 2105.02980 ↗First posted 6 May 2021cs.HC cs.CYcited by 50

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A growing body of literature has proposed formal approaches to audit algorithmic systems for biased and harmful behaviors. While formal auditing approaches have been greatly impactful, they often suffer major blindspots, with critical issues surfacing only in the context of everyday use once systems are deployed. Recent years have seen many cases in which everyday users of algorithmic systems detect and raise awareness about harmful behaviors that they encounter in the course of their everyday interactions with these systems. However, to date little academic attention has been granted to these bottom-up, user-driven auditing processes. In this paper, we propose and explore the concept of everyday algorithm auditing, a process in which users detect, understand, and interrogate problematic machine behaviors via their day-to-day interactions with algorithmic systems. We argue that everyday users are powerful in surfacing problematic machine behaviors that may elude detection via more centrally-organized forms of auditing, regardless of users' knowledge about the underlying algorithms. We analyze several real-world cases of everyday algorithm auditing, drawing lessons from these cases for the design of future platforms and tools that facilitate such auditing behaviors. Finally, we discuss work that lies ahead, toward bridging the gaps between formal auditing approaches and the organic auditing behaviors that emerge in everyday use of algorithmic systems.

Key facts. Cited by 50 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 May 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 11; 2023: 8; 2024: 9; 2025: 16; 2026: 6.

50 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Interactive Model Cards: A Human-Centered Approach to Model Documentationcited by 61
  2. 2023Supporting Human-AI Collaboration in Auditing LLMs with LLMscited by 46
  3. 2022Improving Human-AI Partnerships in Child Welfare: Understanding Worker Practices, Challenges, and Desires for Algorithmic Decision Supportcited by 39
  4. 2022Exploring How Machine Learning Practitioners (Try To) Use Fairness Toolkitscited by 34
  5. 2022Understanding Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities for User-Engaged Algorithm Auditing in Industry Practicecited by 32
  6. 2022Seeing Like a Toolkit: How Toolkits Envision the Work of AI Ethicscited by 28
  7. 2022From plane crashes to algorithmic harm: applicability of safety engineering frameworks for responsible MLcited by 27
  8. 2023Stereotypes and Smut: The (Mis)representation of Non-cisgender Identities by Text-to-Image Modelscited by 27
  9. 2025When Your Reviewer is an LLM: Biases, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Risks in Peer Reviewcited by 19
  10. 2024Wikibench: Community-Driven Data Curation for AI Evaluation on Wikipediacited by 18
  11. 2023Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of "Artificial Intelligence as a Service"cited by 15
  12. 2023Investigating Practices and Opportunities for Cross-functional Collaboration around AI Fairness in Industry Practicecited by 15
38 more
  1. 2024Privacy Leakage Overshadowed by Views of AI: A Study on Human Oversight of Privacy in Language Model Agentcited by 14
  2. 2022System Cards for AI-Based Decision-Making for Public Policycited by 13
  3. 2022Towards a multi-stakeholder value-based assessment framework for algorithmic systemscited by 12
  4. 2023Angler: Helping Machine Translation Practitioners Prioritize Model Improvementscited by 12
  5. 2025Toward a Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Trustworthy LLM-Powered GUI Agentscited by 11
  6. 2022The Algorithmic Imprintcited by 10
  7. 2023Bound by the Bounty: Collaboratively Shaping Evaluation Processes for Queer AI Harmscited by 10
  8. 2024Auditing of AI: Legal, Ethical and Technical Approachescited by 10
  9. 2025PersonaTeaming: Exploring How Introducing Personas Can Improve Automated AI Red-Teamingcited by 9
  10. 2022Auditing YouTube's Recommendation Algorithm for Misinformation Filter Bubblescited by 8
  11. 2024Clarify: Improving Model Robustness With Natural Language Correctionscited by 8
  12. 2025Algorithmic Collective Action with Two Collectivescited by 7
  13. 2023A Systematic Literature Review of Human-Centered, Ethical, and Responsible AIcited by 6
  14. 2025Un-Straightening Generative AI: How Queer Artists Surface and Challenge the Normativity of Generative AI Modelscited by 6
  15. 2025POET: Supporting Prompting Creativity and Personalization with Automated Expansion of Text-to-Image Generationcited by 6
  16. 2024Law and the Emerging Political Economy of Algorithmic Auditscited by 5
  17. 2024Policy Maps: Tools for Guiding the Unbounded Space of LLM Behaviorscited by 5
  18. 2025MIRAGE: Multi-model Interface for Reviewing and Auditing Generative Text-to-Image AIcited by 4
  19. 2025A Toolkit for Compliance, a Toolkit for Justice: Drawing on Cross-sectoral Expertise to Develop a Pro-justice EU AI Act Toolkitcited by 4
  20. 2025Attention to Non-Adopterscited by 4
  21. 2023The Cultivated Practices of Text-to-Image Generationcited by 3
  22. 2024(Beyond) Reasonable Doubt: Challenges that Public Defenders Face in Scrutinizing AI in Courtcited by 3
  23. 2024Legacy Procurement Practices Shape How U.S. Cities Govern AI: Understanding Government Employees' Practices, Challenges, and Needscited by 3
  24. 2022A Keyword Based Approach to Understanding the Overpenalization of Marginalized Groups by English Marginal Abuse Models on Twittercited by 1
  25. 2025FairFare: A Tool for Crowdsourcing Rideshare Data to Empower Labor Organizerscited by 1
  26. 2025AI LEGO: Scaffolding Cross-Functional Collaboration in Industrial Responsible AI Practices during Early Design Stagescited by 1
  27. 2025Towards Meaningful Transparency in Civic AI Systemscited by 1
  28. 2024Learning About Algorithm Auditing in Five Steps: Scaffolding How High School Youth Can Systematically and Critically Evaluate Machine Learning Applicationscited by 0
  29. 2025Testing software for non-discrimination: an updated and extended audit in the Italian car insurance domaincited by 0
  30. 2025From Seed to Harvest: Augmenting Human Creativity with AI for Red-teaming Text-to-Image Modelscited by 0
  31. 2025PolicyPad: Collaborative Prototyping of LLM Policiescited by 0
  32. 2025Seeing Twice: How Side-by-Side T2I Comparison Changes Auditing Strategiescited by 0
  33. 2026Large Language Models in Peer-Run Community Behavioral Health Services: Understanding Peer Specialists and Service Users' Perspectives on Opportunities, Risks, and Mitigation Strategiescited by 0
  34. 2026Bureaucratic Silences: What the Canadian AI Register Reveals, Omits, and Obscurescited by 0
  35. 2026PersonaTeaming: Supporting Persona-Driven Red-Teaming for Generative AIcited by 0
  36. 2026Compass: Continuously Aligning Social Media Feeds via In-Situ Reflectionscited by 0
  37. 2026Identifying Harm in Personalized, Generative AI Systems Requires User-Centered Auditing at the Interaction Levelcited by 0
  38. 2026Disrupted Companionship: A Risk Assessment Framework and Cross-Platform Quantitative Analysis of Psychosocial Responses to AI Companion Disruptionscited by 0