mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Leveraging an Alignment Set in Tackling Instance-Dependent Label Noise

arXiv 2307.04868 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2023cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Noisy training labels can hurt model performance. Most approaches that aim to address label noise assume label noise is independent from the input features. In practice, however, label noise is often feature or textitinstance-dependent, and therefore biased (i.e., some instances are more likely to be mislabeled than others). E.g., in clinical care, female patients are more likely to be under-diagnosed for cardiovascular disease compared to male patients. Approaches that ignore this dependence can produce models with poor discriminative performance, and in many healthcare settings, can exacerbate issues around health disparities. In light of these limitations, we propose a two-stage approach to learn in the presence instance-dependent label noise. Our approach utilizes textitanchor points, a small subset of data for which we know the observed and ground truth labels. On several tasks, our approach leads to consistent improvements over the state-of-the-art in discriminative performance (AUROC) while mitigating bias (area under the equalized odds curve, AUEOC). For example, when predicting acute respiratory failure onset on the MIMIC-III dataset, our approach achieves a harmonic mean (AUROC and AUEOC) of 0.84 (SD [standard deviation] 0.01) while that of the next best baseline is 0.81 (SD 0.01). Overall, our approach improves accuracy while mitigating potential bias compared to existing approaches in the presence of instance-dependent label noise.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2023.

Builds on

40 of 84 references.

References · 40

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  3. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  4. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  5. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  6. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  7. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  8. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  9. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  10. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  11. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  12. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
28 more
  1. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  2. 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
  3. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  4. 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
  5. 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
  6. 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
  7. 2019Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learningcited by 108
  8. 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
  9. 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
  10. 2020Error-Bounded Correction of Noisy Labelscited by 74
  11. 2021Generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence Loss for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 74
  12. 2021To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labelscited by 70
  13. 2020Fair Classification with Group-Dependent Label Noisecited by 67
  14. 2020Confidence Scores Make Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning Possiblecited by 63
  15. 2017Learning with Bounded Instance- and Label-dependent Label Noisecited by 57
  16. 2021Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to Predictcited by 57
  17. 2020An Empirical Characterization of Fair Machine Learning For Clinical Risk Predictioncited by 45
  18. 2020Fairness in Biometrics: a figure of merit to assess biometric verification systemscited by 41
  19. 2020Learning to Purify Noisy Labels via Meta Soft Label Correctorcited by 39
  20. 2019Counterfactual Reasoning for Fair Clinical Risk Predictioncited by 28
  21. 2021VisualCheXbert: Addressing the Discrepancy Between Radiology Report Labels and Image Labelscited by 27
  22. 2022Beyond Images: Label Noise Transition Matrix Estimation for Tasks with Lower-Quality Featurescited by 27
  23. 2019L_DMI: An Information-theoretic Noise-robust Loss Functioncited by 26
  24. 2021Understanding Instance-Level Label Noise: Disparate Impacts and Treatmentscited by 22
  25. 2022From Noisy Prediction to True Label: Noisy Prediction Calibration via Generative Modelcited by 21
  26. 2021Tackling Instance-Dependent Label Noise via a Universal Probabilistic Modelcited by 12
  27. 2022Disparate Censorship & Undertesting: A Source of Label Bias in Clinical Machine Learningcited by 7
  28. 2019Relaxed Parameter Sharing: Effectively Modeling Time-Varying Relationships in Clinical Time-Seriescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.