mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Noise-tolerant fair classification

arXiv 1901.10837 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2019cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 40

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness-aware learning involves designing algorithms that do not discriminate with respect to some sensitive feature (e.g., race or gender). Existing work on the problem operates under the assumption that the sensitive feature available in one's training sample is perfectly reliable. This assumption may be violated in many real-world cases: for example, respondents to a survey may choose to conceal or obfuscate their group identity out of fear of potential discrimination. This poses the question of whether one can still learn fair classifiers given noisy sensitive features. In this paper, we answer the question in the affirmative: we show that if one measures fairness using the mean-difference score, and sensitive features are subject to noise from the mutually contaminated learning model, then owing to a simple identity we only need to change the desired fairness-tolerance. The requisite tolerance can be estimated by leveraging existing noise-rate estimators from the label noise literature. We finally show that our procedure is empirically effective on two case-studies involving sensitive feature censoring.

Key facts. Cited by 40 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 12; 2022: 12; 2023: 10; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

40 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 125
  2. 2021Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspectivecited by 116
  3. 2021Sample Selection for Fair and Robust Trainingcited by 48
  4. 2021Learning Fair Classifiers with Partially Annotated Group Labelscited by 40
  5. 2021Evaluating Fairness of Machine Learning Models Under Uncertain and Incomplete Informationcited by 33
  6. 2021Fairness for Image Generation with Uncertain Sensitive Attributescited by 31
  7. 2022Beyond Images: Label Noise Transition Matrix Estimation for Tasks with Lower-Quality Featurescited by 27
  8. 2023Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: on the Perspective of Trade-offcited by 26
  9. 2021A Sociotechnical View of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 24
  10. 2021Fair Classification with Adversarial Perturbationscited by 23
  11. 2021Fairness-Aware PAC Learning from Corrupted Datacited by 18
  12. 2022Weak Proxies are Sufficient and Preferable for Fairness with Missing Sensitive Attributescited by 17
28 more
  1. 2022Fair Ranking with Noisy Protected Attributescited by 17
  2. 2021Can Less be More? When Increasing-to-Balancing Label Noise Rates Considered Beneficialcited by 13
  3. 2021Measuring Model Fairness under Noisy Covariates: A Theoretical Perspectivecited by 7
  4. 2023Toward Operationalizing Pipeline-aware ML Fairness: A Research Agenda for Developing Practical Guidelines and Toolscited by 7
  5. 2022When Fairness Meets Privacy: Fair Classification with Semi-Private Sensitive Attributescited by 6
  6. 2022Combating Health Misinformation in Social Media: Characterization, Detection, Intervention, and Open Issuescited by 6
  7. 2023When Fair Classification Meets Noisy Protected Attributescited by 6
  8. 2022Prisoners of Their Own Devices: How Models Induce Data Bias in Performative Predictioncited by 5
  9. 2023How Far Can Fairness Constraints Help Recover From Biased Data?cited by 5
  10. 2022Breaking Fair Binary Classification with Optimal Flipping Attackscited by 4
  11. 2023Toward the Tradeoffs between Privacy, Fairness and Utility in Federated Learningcited by 4
  12. 2022Outlier-Robust Group Inference via Gradient Space Clusteringcited by 3
  13. 2023Hyper-parameter Tuning for Fair Classification without Sensitive Attribute Accesscited by 3
  14. 2022A Survey on Preserving Fairness Guarantees in Changing Environmentscited by 2
  15. 2023Group Fairness with Uncertainty in Sensitive Attributescited by 2
  16. 2023Sampling Individually-Fair Rankings that are Always Group Faircited by 2
  17. 2023Trading-off price for data quality to achieve fair online allocationcited by 2
  18. 2022Towards Fair Classification against Poisoning Attackscited by 1
  19. 2023On Comparing Fair Classifiers under Data Biascited by 1
  20. 2024Robust Fair Clustering with Group Membership Uncertainty Setscited by 1
  21. 2021FLEA: Provably Robust Fair Multisource Learning from Unreliable Training Datacited by 0
  22. 2021An Empirical Investigation of Learning from Biased Toxicity Labelscited by 0
  23. 2022Repairing Group-Level Errors for DNNs Using Weighted Regularizationcited by 0
  24. 2024Fairness Risks for Group-conditionally Missing Demographicscited by 0
  25. 2025A Critical Review of Predominant Bias in Neural Networkscited by 0
  26. 2025GFLC: Graph-based Fairness-aware Label Correction for Fair Classificationcited by 0
  27. 2025FedPF: Accurate Target Privacy Preserving Federated Learning Balancing Fairness and Utilitycited by 0
  28. 2026Beyond Binary: Continuous State Optimization with Graph-Structured Objectivescited by 0