mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fair-OBNC: Correcting Label Noise for Fairer Datasets

arXiv 2410.06214 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2024cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data used by automated decision-making systems, such as Machine Learning models, often reflects discriminatory behavior that occurred in the past. These biases in the training data are sometimes related to label noise, such as in COMPAS, where more African-American offenders are wrongly labeled as having a higher risk of recidivism when compared to their White counterparts. Models trained on such biased data may perpetuate or even aggravate the biases with respect to sensitive information, such as gender, race, or age. However, while multiple label noise correction approaches are available in the literature, these focus on model performance exclusively. In this work, we propose Fair-OBNC, a label noise correction method with fairness considerations, to produce training datasets with measurable demographic parity. The presented method adapts Ordering-Based Noise Correction, with an adjusted criterion of ordering, based both on the margin of error of an ensemble, and the potential increase in the observed demographic parity of the dataset. We evaluate Fair-OBNC against other different pre-processing techniques, under different scenarios of controlled label noise. Our results show that the proposed method is the overall better alternative within the pool of label correction methods, being capable of attaining better reconstructions of the original labels. Models trained in the corrected data have an increase, on average, of 150% in demographic parity, when compared to models trained in data with noisy labels, across the considered levels of label noise.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2024.

Builds on

18 of 38 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  2. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  3. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  4. 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
  5. 2019Image Classification with Deep Learning in the Presence of Noisy Labels: A Surveycited by 101
  6. 2014Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discriminationcited by 83
  7. 2020Error-Bounded Correction of Noisy Labelscited by 74
  8. 2020Fair Classification with Group-Dependent Label Noisecited by 67
  9. 2019Operationalizing Individual Fairness with Pairwise Fair Representationscited by 64
  10. 2019Conscientious Classification: A Data Scientist's Guide to Discrimination-Aware Classificationcited by 55
  11. 2021Towards Fair Classifiers Without Sensitive Attributes: Exploring Biases in Related Featurescited by 45
  12. 2022Turning the Tables: Biased, Imbalanced, Dynamic Tabular Datasets for ML Evaluationcited by 40
6 more
  1. 2020FAE: A Fairness-Aware Ensemble Frameworkcited by 34
  2. 2021Can Less be More? When Increasing-to-Balancing Label Noise Rates Considered Beneficialcited by 13
  3. 2021An Empirical Comparison of Bias Reduction Methods on Real-World Problems in High-Stakes Policy Settingscited by 8
  4. 2022Quantized Training of Gradient Boosting Decision Treescited by 6
  5. 2024Aequitas Flow: Streamlining Fair ML Experimentationcited by 4
  6. 2023Systematic analysis of the impact of label noise correction on ML Fairnesscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.