Mitigating Label Bias in Machine Learning: Fairness through Confident Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Discrimination can occur when the underlying unbiased labels are overwritten by an agent with potential bias, resulting in biased datasets that unfairly harm specific groups and cause classifiers to inherit these biases. In this paper, we demonstrate that despite only having access to the biased labels, it is possible to eliminate bias by filtering the fairest instances within the framework of confident learning. In the context of confident learning, low self-confidence usually indicates potential label errors; however, this is not always the case. Instances, particularly those from underrepresented groups, might exhibit low confidence scores for reasons other than labeling errors. To address this limitation, our approach employs truncation of the confidence score and extends the confidence interval of the probabilistic threshold. Additionally, we incorporate with co-teaching paradigm for providing a more robust and reliable selection of fair instances and effectively mitigating the adverse effects of biased labels. Through extensive experimentation and evaluation of various datasets, we demonstrate the efficacy of our approach in promoting fairness and reducing the impact of label bias in machine learning models.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2023.
Builds on
24 of 43 references.
References · 24
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
- 2019Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learningcited by 339
- 2022Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and Not Yet Learntcited by 236
- 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
- 2020GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learningcited by 226
- 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 222
- 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
- 2019Towards Fairer Datasets: Filtering and Balancing the Distribution of the People Subtree in the ImageNet Hierarchycited by 156
- 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
- 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
12 more
- 2015Online Batch Selection for Faster Training of Neural Networkscited by 122
- 2019Fair Generative Modeling via Weak Supervisioncited by 114
- 2020FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model Fairnesscited by 99
- 2018Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 72
- 2020Fair Classification with Group-Dependent Label Noisecited by 67
- 2021Post-processing for Individual Fairnesscited by 61
- 2018Two-Player Games for Efficient Non-Convex Constrained Optimizationcited by 55
- 2020FR-Train: A Mutual Information-Based Approach to Fair and Robust Trainingcited by 52
- 2019Ordered SGD: A New Stochastic Optimization Framework for Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 51
- 2019Recovering from Biased Data: Can Fairness Constraints Improve Accuracy?cited by 50
- 2021LongReMix: Robust Learning with High Confidence Samples in a Noisy Label Environmentcited by 40
- 2020Fairness Evaluation in Presence of Biased Noisy Labelscited by 38
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.