mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning with Noisy Labels over Imbalanced Subpopulations

arXiv 2211.08722 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2022cs.LG cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning with Noisy Labels (LNL) has attracted significant attention from the research community. Many recent LNL methods rely on the assumption that clean samples tend to have "small loss". However, this assumption always fails to generalize to some real-world cases with imbalanced subpopulations, i.e., training subpopulations varying in sample size or recognition difficulty. Therefore, recent LNL methods face the risk of misclassifying those "informative" samples (e.g., hard samples or samples in the tail subpopulations) into noisy samples, leading to poor generalization performance. To address the above issue, we propose a novel LNL method to simultaneously deal with noisy labels and imbalanced subpopulations. It first leverages sample correlation to estimate samples' clean probabilities for label correction and then utilizes corrected labels for Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO) to further improve the robustness. Specifically, in contrast to previous works using classification loss as the selection criterion, we introduce a feature-based metric that takes the sample correlation into account for estimating samples' clean probabilities. Then, we refurbish the noisy labels using the estimated clean probabilities and the pseudo-labels from the model's predictions. With refurbished labels, we use DRO to train the model to be robust to subpopulation imbalance. Extensive experiments on a wide range of benchmarks demonstrate that our technique can consistently improve current state-of-the-art robust learning paradigms against noisy labels, especially when encountering imbalanced subpopulations.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2022.

Builds on

46 of 67 references.

References · 46

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  5. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  6. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  7. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  8. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
  9. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
  10. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  11. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
  12. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
34 more
  1. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  2. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 523
  3. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  4. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  5. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 364
  6. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  7. 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
  8. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  9. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 256
  10. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  11. 2020No Subclass Left Behind: Fine-Grained Robustness in Coarse-Grained Classification Problemscited by 209
  12. 2022Improving Out-of-Distribution Robustness via Selective Augmentationcited by 202
  13. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  14. 2022Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 172
  15. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  16. 2020BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shiftcited by 155
  17. 2020Learning from Failure: Training Debiased Classifier from Biased Classifiercited by 133
  18. 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 122
  19. 2022Selective-Supervised Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
  20. 2022Spread Spurious Attribute: Improving Worst-group Accuracy with Spurious Attribute Estimationcited by 88
  21. 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
  22. 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
  23. 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
  24. 2020A Topological Filter for Learning with Label Noisecited by 76
  25. 2020Coping with Label Shift via Distributionally Robust Optimisationcited by 70
  26. 2020Fair Classification with Group-Dependent Label Noisecited by 67
  27. 2021Examining and Combating Spurious Features under Distribution Shiftcited by 65
  28. 2021NGC: A Unified Framework for Learning with Open-World Noisy Datacited by 58
  29. 2021DORO: Distributional and Outlier Robust Optimizationcited by 56
  30. 2022Learning with Neighbor Consistency for Noisy Labelscited by 55
  31. 2021Hard Sample Aware Noise Robust Learning for Histopathology Image Classificationcited by 48
  32. 2021Robust Long-Tailed Learning under Label Noisecited by 36
  33. 2021Boosting Co-teaching with Compression Regularization for Label Noisecited by 31
  34. 2022Identifying Hard Noise in Long-Tailed Sample Distributioncited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

5 papers.