mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FairRoad: Achieving Fairness for Recommender Systems with Optimized Antidote Data

arXiv 2212.06750 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2022cs.IR cs.CR cs.CYcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Today, recommender systems have played an increasingly important role in shaping our experiences of digital environments and social interactions. However, as recommender systems become ubiquitous in our society, recent years have also witnessed significant fairness concerns for recommender systems. Specifically, studies have shown that recommender systems may inherit or even amplify biases from historical data, and as a result, provide unfair recommendations. To address fairness risks in recommender systems, most of the previous approaches to date are focused on modifying either the existing training data samples or the deployed recommender algorithms, but unfortunately with limited degrees of success. In this paper, we propose a new approach called fair recommendation with optimized antidote data (FairRoad), which aims to improve the fairness performances of recommender systems through the construction of a small and carefully crafted antidote dataset. Toward this end, we formulate our antidote data generation task as a mathematical optimization problem, which minimizes the unfairness of the targeted recommender systems while not disrupting the deployed recommendation algorithms. Extensive experiments show that our proposed antidote data generation algorithm significantly improve the fairness of recommender systems with a small amounts of antidote data.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2022.

Builds on

50 of 79 references.

References · 50

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
  3. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
  4. 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
  5. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
  6. 2019Fair Resource Allocation in Federated Learningcited by 389
  7. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  8. 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 330
  9. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  10. 2020Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directionscited by 239
  11. 2018Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression Learningcited by 219
  12. 2020Gradient Vaccine: Investigating and Improving Multi-task Optimization in Massively Multilingual Modelscited by 167
38 more
  1. 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
  2. 2019On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 126
  3. 2018Stronger Data Poisoning Attacks Break Data Sanitization Defensescited by 125
  4. 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
  5. 2020Just How Toxic is Data Poisoning? A Unified Benchmark for Backdoor and Data Poisoning Attackscited by 109
  6. 2018A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indicescited by 97
  7. 2017Beyond Parity: Fairness Objectives for Collaborative Filteringcited by 93
  8. 2018Is feature selection secure against training data poisoning?cited by 88
  9. 2016Data Poisoning Attacks on Factorization-Based Collaborative Filteringcited by 78
  10. 2020FairRec: Two-Sided Fairness for Personalized Recommendations in Two-Sided Platformscited by 77
  11. 2020Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphscited by 74
  12. 2020Subpopulation Data Poisoning Attackscited by 68
  13. 2020Controlling Fairness and Bias in Dynamic Learning-to-Rankcited by 67
  14. 2020Fair Classification with Group-Dependent Label Noisecited by 67
  15. 2020Influence Function based Data Poisoning Attacks to Top-N Recommender Systemscited by 61
  16. 2021Post-processing for Individual Fairnesscited by 61
  17. 2017From Parity to Preference-based Notions of Fairness in Classificationcited by 60
  18. 2020Poisoning Attacks on Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 58
  19. 2018Poisoning Attacks to Graph-Based Recommender Systemscited by 52
  20. 2020Do the Machine Learning Models on a Crowd Sourced Platform Exhibit Bias? An Empirical Study on Model Fairnesscited by 52
  21. 2021Deconfounded Recommendation for Alleviating Bias Amplificationcited by 51
  22. 2021Learning Fair Representations for Recommendation: A Graph-based Perspectivecited by 50
  23. 2020FairRec: Fairness-aware News Recommendation with Decomposed Adversarial Learningcited by 44
  24. 2018Fighting Fire with Fire: Using Antidote Data to Improve Polarization and Fairness of Recommender Systemscited by 37
  25. 2020Selective Classification Can Magnify Disparities Across Groupscited by 35
  26. 2018Data Poisoning Attacks against Online Learningcited by 24
  27. 2019Addressing Marketing Bias in Product Recommendationscited by 23
  28. 2019Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocolscited by 20
  29. 2021OmniFair: A Declarative System for Model-Agnostic Group Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 18
  30. 2021Maxmin-Fair Ranking: Individual Fairness under Group-Fairness Constraintscited by 18
  31. 2019Discrimination through optimization: How Facebook's ad delivery can lead to skewed outcomescited by 15
  32. 2020FaiR-N: Fair and Robust Neural Networks for Structured Datacited by 15
  33. 2021Estimation of Fair Ranking Metrics with Incomplete Judgmentscited by 14
  34. 2020Achieving Fairness via Post-Processing in Web-Scale Recommender Systemscited by 13
  35. 2021Data Poisoning Attacks and Defenses to Crowdsourcing Systemscited by 12
  36. 2021Individually Fair Rankingcited by 7
  37. 2019Bias Disparity in Collaborative Recommendation: Algorithmic Evaluation and Comparisoncited by 6
  38. 2022Equal Experience in Recommender Systemscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.