mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sample Complexity of Asynchronous Q-Learning: Sharper Analysis and Variance Reduction

arXiv 2006.03041 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2020cs.LG eess.SP math.OCcited by 93

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Asynchronous Q-learning aims to learn the optimal action-value function (or Q-function) of a Markov decision process (MDP), based on a single trajectory of Markovian samples induced by a behavior policy. Focusing on a γ-discounted MDP with state space S and action space A, we demonstrate that the ℓ∞-based sample complexity of classical asynchronous Q-learning --- namely, the number of samples needed to yield an entrywise varepsilon-accurate estimate of the Q-function --- is at most on the order of frac1μmin(1-γ)5varepsilon2+ fractmixμmin(1-γ) up to some logarithmic factor, provided that a proper constant learning rate is adopted. Here, tmix and μmin denote respectively the mixing time and the minimum state-action occupancy probability of the sample trajectory. The first term of this bound matches the sample complexity in the synchronous case with independent samples drawn from the stationary distribution of the trajectory. The second term reflects the cost taken for the empirical distribution of the Markovian trajectory to reach a steady state, which is incurred at the very beginning and becomes amortized as the algorithm runs. Encouragingly, the above bound improves upon the state-of-the-art result citequ2020finite by a factor of at least |S||A| for all scenarios, and by a factor of at least tmix|S||A| for any sufficiently small accuracy level varepsilon. Further, we demonstrate that the scaling on the effective horizon frac11-γ can be improved by means of variance reduction.

Key facts. Cited by 93 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2020: 1; 2021: 21; 2022: 15; 2023: 17; 2024: 18; 2025: 7; 2026: 14.

93 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2020Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?cited by 362
  2. 2021Online Robust Reinforcement Learning with Model Uncertaintycited by 95
  3. 2021Is Q-Learning Minimax Optimal? A Tight Sample Complexity Analysiscited by 89
  4. 2022Distributionally Robust Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Near-Optimal Sample Complexitycited by 85
  5. 2022Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards Optimal Sample Complexitycited by 84
  6. 2022Settling the Sample Complexity of Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 82
  7. 2021Fast Policy Extragradient Methods for Competitive Games with Entropy Regularizationcited by 61
  8. 2021A Lyapunov Theory for Finite-Sample Guarantees of Asynchronous Q-Learning and TD-Learning Variantscited by 57
  9. 2021Near-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning via Double Variance Reductioncited by 56
  10. 2021Breaking the Sample Complexity Barrier to Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 51
  11. 2022Linear Convergence of Natural Policy Gradient Methods with Log-Linear Policiescited by 44
  12. 2023Settling the Sample Complexity of Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 44
38 more
  1. 2022The Efficacy of Pessimism in Asynchronous Q-Learningcited by 41
  2. 2021Reinforcement Learning for Selective Key Applications in Power Systems: Recent Advances and Future Challengescited by 40
  3. 2023The Blessing of Heterogeneity in Federated Q-Learning: Linear Speedup and Beyondcited by 34
  4. 2021Gradient play in stochastic games: stationary points, convergence, and sample complexitycited by 32
  5. 2022Target Network and Truncation Overcome The Deadly Triad in Q-Learningcited by 31
  6. 2022Stochastic first-order methods for average-reward Markov decision processescited by 30
  7. 2023On the Importance of Exploration for Generalization in Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
  8. 2021A Statistical Analysis of Polyak-Ruppert Averaged Q-learningcited by 29
  9. 2021Navigating to the Best Policy in Markov Decision Processescited by 28
  10. 2021Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning Is Feasible for Linearly Realizable MDPs with Limited Revisitingcited by 27
  11. 2021Finite-Sample Analysis of Off-Policy Natural Actor-Critic Algorithmcited by 26
  12. 2023Concentration of Contractive Stochastic Approximation: Additive and Multiplicative Noisecited by 26
  13. 2021Concentration of Contractive Stochastic Approximation and Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
  14. 2021Convergence of Finite Memory Q-Learning for POMDPs and Near Optimality of Learned Policies under Filter Stabilitycited by 20
  15. 2021Online Target Q-learning with Reverse Experience Replay: Efficiently finding the Optimal Policy for Linear MDPscited by 19
  16. 2021Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Linearly-Parameterized MDPs with a Generative Modelcited by 18
  17. 2023On the Convergence and Sample Complexity Analysis of Deep Q-Networks with ε-Greedy Explorationcited by 17
  18. 2024Constant Stepsize Q-learning: Distributional Convergence, Bias and Extrapolationcited by 17
  19. 2021A Discrete-Time Switching System Analysis of Q-learningcited by 16
  20. 2023High-probability sample complexities for policy evaluation with linear function approximationcited by 16
  21. 2023A Finite-Sample Analysis of Payoff-Based Independent Learning in Zero-Sum Stochastic Gamescited by 15
  22. 2023Scalable Primal-Dual Actor-Critic Method for Safe Multi-Agent RL with General Utilitiescited by 15
  23. 2023Improved Regret Bounds for Linear Adversarial MDPs via Linear Optimizationcited by 14
  24. 2022Offline Reinforcement Learning with Differentiable Function Approximation is Provably Efficientcited by 12
  25. 2023Off-Policy RL Algorithms Can be Sample-Efficient for Continuous Control via Sample Multiple Reusecited by 12
  26. 2023Robust Markov Decision Processes without Model Estimationcited by 11
  27. 2024Federated Offline Reinforcement Learning: Collaborative Single-Policy Coverage Sufficescited by 11
  28. 2022Statistically Efficient Advantage Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning in Infinite Horizonscited by 10
  29. 2023A Concentration Bound for TD(0) with Function Approximationcited by 10
  30. 2024Model-Free Robust Reinforcement Learning with Sample Complexity Analysiscited by 9
  31. 2024Mean-Field Sampling for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
  32. 2023Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning for Discounted MDPs with Short Burn-In Timecited by 8
  33. 2024Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Global Decision Making in the Presence of Local Agents at Scalecited by 8
  34. 2024The Sample-Communication Complexity Trade-off in Federated Q-Learningcited by 8
  35. 2024Gap-Dependent Bounds for Q-Learning using Reference-Advantage Decompositioncited by 8
  36. 2021Convergence Results For Q-Learning With Experience Replaycited by 5
  37. 2022Instance-Dependent Confidence and Early Stopping for Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
  38. 2022A Near-Optimal Primal-Dual Method for Off-Policy Learning in CMDPcited by 5

50 most cited of 93 All 93 (JSON)