The Sample-Communication Complexity Trade-off in Federated Q-Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of federated Q-learning, where M agents aim to collaboratively learn the optimal Q-function of an unknown infinite-horizon Markov decision process with finite state and action spaces. We investigate the trade-off between sample and communication complexities for the widely used class of intermittent communication algorithms. We first establish the converse result, where it is shown that a federated Q-learning algorithm that offers any speedup with respect to the number of agents in the per-agent sample complexity needs to incur a communication cost of at least an order of frac11-γ up to logarithmic factors, where γ is the discount factor. We also propose a new algorithm, called Fed-DVR-Q, which is the first federated Q-learning algorithm to simultaneously achieve order-optimal sample and communication complexities. Thus, together these results provide a complete characterization of the sample-communication complexity trade-off in federated Q-learning.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2024.
Builds on
42 of 70 references.
References · 42
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
- 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
- 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 485
- 2019A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologiescited by 373
- 2019Tighter Theory for Local SGD on Identical and Heterogeneous Datacited by 266
- 2019Local SGD with Periodic Averaging: Tighter Analysis and Adaptive Synchronizationcited by 106
- 2020Finite-Time Analysis of Asynchronous Stochastic Approximation and Q-Learningcited by 93
- 2020Sample Complexity of Asynchronous Q-Learning: Sharper Analysis and Variance Reductioncited by 93
- 2021Is Q-Learning Minimax Optimal? A Tight Sample Complexity Analysiscited by 89
- 2022Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards Optimal Sample Complexitycited by 84
- 2019Provably Efficient Q-Learning with Low Switching Costcited by 77
30 more
- 2019Stochastic approximation with cone-contractive operators: Sharp ℓ_∞-bounds for Q-learningcited by 74
- 2019Variance-reduced Q-learning is minimax optimalcited by 72
- 2022Federated Reinforcement Learning with Environment Heterogeneitycited by 61
- 2021Federated Multi-Armed Banditscited by 59
- 2021A Lyapunov Theory for Finite-Sample Guarantees of Asynchronous Q-Learning and TD-Learning Variantscited by 57
- 2021Breaking the Sample Complexity Barrier to Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 51
- 2015Communication Lower Bounds for Statistical Estimation Problems via a Distributed Data Processing Inequalitycited by 50
- 2021UCB Momentum Q-learning: Correcting the bias without forgettingcited by 45
- 2022The Efficacy of Pessimism in Asynchronous Q-Learningcited by 41
- 2018Graph Oracle Models, Lower Bounds, and Gaps for Parallel Stochastic Optimizationcited by 34
- 2023The Blessing of Heterogeneity in Federated Q-Learning: Linear Speedup and Beyondcited by 34
- 2021The Min-Max Complexity of Distributed Stochastic Convex Optimization with Intermittent Communicationcited by 30
- 2022FedKL: Tackling Data Heterogeneity in Federated Reinforcement Learning by Penalizing KL Divergencecited by 29
- 2024Finite-Time Analysis of On-Policy Heterogeneous Federated Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
- 2021Sample and Communication-Efficient Decentralized Actor-Critic Algorithms with Finite-Time Analysiscited by 25
- 2023Federated Temporal Difference Learning with Linear Function Approximation under Environmental Heterogeneitycited by 25
- 2020A Decentralized Policy Gradient Approach to Multi-task Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
- 2020Towards Understanding Asynchronous Advantage Actor-critic: Convergence and Linear Speedupcited by 23
- 2021Instance-optimality in optimal value estimation: Adaptivity via variance-reduced Q-learningcited by 21
- 2024Asynchronous Federated Reinforcement Learning with Policy Gradient Updates: Algorithm Design and Convergence Analysiscited by 21
- 2023Federated Q-Learning: Linear Regret Speedup with Low Communication Costcited by 19
- 2019Gossip-based Actor-Learner Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2019Finite-Time Performance of Distributed Temporal Difference Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 14
- 2023Distributed TD(0) with Almost No Communicationcited by 11
- 2023Federated Natural Policy Gradient and Actor Critic Methods for Multi-task Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
- 2024Federated Offline Reinforcement Learning: Collaborative Single-Policy Coverage Sufficescited by 11
- 2020On the Convergence of Consensus Algorithms with Markovian Noise and Gradient Biascited by 10
- 2014Optimality guarantees for distributed statistical estimationcited by 9
- 2022Distributed Linear Bandits under Communication Constraintscited by 8
- 2024One-Shot Averaging for Distributed TD(λ) Under Markov Samplingcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2024On the Linear Speedup of Personalized Federated Reinforcement Learning with Shared Representationscited by 4
- 2025Gap-Dependent Bounds for Federated Q-learningcited by 4
- 2024On the Convergence Rates of Federated Q-Learning across Heterogeneous Environmentscited by 2
- 2025Statistical and Algorithmic Foundations of Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
- 2025Convergence Guarantees for Federated SARSA with Local Training and Heterogeneous Agentscited by 2
- 2025Achieving Tighter Finite-Time Rates for Heterogeneous Federated Stochastic Approximation under Markovian Samplingcited by 1
- 2026Sample Complexity of Average-Reward Q-Learning: From Single-agent to Federated Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Provably Efficient Federated Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation and Logarithmic Communication Costcited by 0
- 2026Provably Efficient Federated Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation and Logarithmic Communication Cost31 Aug 2026
- 2026Sample Complexity of Average-Reward Q-Learning: From Single-agent to Federated Reinforcement Learning20 Jan 2026
- 2025Convergence Guarantees for Federated SARSA with Local Training and Heterogeneous Agents19 Dec 2025
- 2025Statistical and Algorithmic Foundations of Reinforcement Learning19 Jul 2025
- 2025Achieving Tighter Finite-Time Rates for Heterogeneous Federated Stochastic Approximation under Markovian Sampling15 Apr 2025
- 2025Gap-Dependent Bounds for Federated Q-learning5 Feb 2025
- 2024On the Linear Speedup of Personalized Federated Reinforcement Learning with Shared Representations22 Nov 2024
- 2024On the Convergence Rates of Federated Q-Learning across Heterogeneous Environments5 Sep 2024