Sharp asymptotic theory for Q-learning with LDTZ learning rate and its generalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the sustained popularity of Q-learning as a practical tool for policy determination, a majority of relevant theoretical literature deals with either constant (ηtequiv η) or polynomially decaying (ηt = η t-α) learning schedules. However, it is well known that these choices suffer from either persistent bias or prohibitively slow convergence. In contrast, the recently proposed linear decay to zero (textttLD2Z: ηt,n=η(1-t/n)) schedule has shown appreciable empirical performance, but its theoretical and statistical properties remain largely unexplored, especially in the Q-learning setting. We address this gap in the literature by first considering a general class of power-law decay to zero (textttPD2Z-nu: ηt,n=η(1-t/n)nu). Proceeding step-by-step, we present a sharp non-asymptotic error bound for Q-learning with textttPD2Z-nu schedule, which then is used to derive a central limit theory for a new textittail Polyak-Ruppert averaging estimator. Finally, we also provide a novel time-uniform Gaussian approximation (also known as textitstrong invariance principle) for the partial sum process of Q-learning iterates, which facilitates bootstrap-based inference. All our theoretical results are complemented by extensive numerical experiments. Beyond being new theoretical and statistical contributions to the Q-learning literature, our results definitively establish that textttLD2Z and in general textttPD2Z-nu achieve a best-of-both-worlds property: they inherit the rapid decay from initialization (characteristic of constant step-sizes) while retaining the asymptotic convergence guarantees (characteristic of polynomially decaying schedules). This dual advantage explains the empirical success of textttLD2Z while providing practical guidelines for inference through our results.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.
Builds on
34 of 77 references.
References · 34
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,140
- 2018A Finite Time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning With Linear Function Approximationcited by 225
- 2024Scaling Laws and Compute-Optimal Training Beyond Fixed Training Durationscited by 160
- 2020Finite-Time Analysis of Asynchronous Stochastic Approximation and Q-Learningcited by 93
- 2020Sample Complexity of Asynchronous Q-Learning: Sharper Analysis and Variance Reductioncited by 93
- 2021Is Q-Learning Minimax Optimal? A Tight Sample Complexity Analysiscited by 89
- 2022Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards Optimal Sample Complexitycited by 84
- 2016Statistical Inference for Model Parameters in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 71
- 2020On Linear Stochastic Approximation: Fine-grained Polyak-Ruppert and Non-Asymptotic Concentrationcited by 65
22 more
- 2021A Lyapunov Theory for Finite-Sample Guarantees of Asynchronous Q-Learning and TD-Learning Variantscited by 57
- 2020Is Temporal Difference Learning Optimal? An Instance-Dependent Analysiscited by 41
- 2023Optimal Linear Decay Learning Rate Schedules and Further Refinementscited by 41
- 2020Online Covariance Matrix Estimation in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 37
- 2025Straight to Zero: Why Linearly Decaying the Learning Rate to Zero Works Best for LLMscited by 34
- 2021Time-uniform central limit theory and asymptotic confidence sequencescited by 29
- 2021A Statistical Analysis of Polyak-Ruppert Averaged Q-learningcited by 29
- 2021Fast and Robust Online Inference with Stochastic Gradient Descent via Random Scalingcited by 28
- 2020Wide-minima Density Hypothesis and the Explore-Exploit Learning Rate Schedulecited by 25
- 2021Instance-optimality in optimal value estimation: Adaptivity via variance-reduced Q-learningcited by 21
- 2024Gaussian Approximation and Multiplier Bootstrap for Polyak-Ruppert Averaged Linear Stochastic Approximation with Applications to TD Learningcited by 19
- 2023Online Statistical Inference for Nonlinear Stochastic Approximation with Markovian Datacited by 18
- 2024Constant Stepsize Q-learning: Distributional Convergence, Bias and Extrapolationcited by 17
- 2024Statistical Inference for Policy Evaluation with Temporal Difference Learningcited by 13
- 2025Statistical inference for Linear Stochastic Approximation with Markovian Noisecited by 11
- 2024High Confidence Level Inference is Almost Free using Parallel Stochastic Optimizationcited by 9
- 2025Uncertainty quantification for Markov chain induced martingales with application to temporal difference learningcited by 8
- 2023Weighted Averaged Stochastic Gradient Descent: Asymptotic Normality and Optimalitycited by 7
- 2024Asymptotic Time-Uniform Inference for Parameters in Averaged Stochastic Approximationcited by 3
- 2025Statistical and Algorithmic Foundations of Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
- 2025Sharp Gaussian approximations for Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 1
- 2026Online Statistical Inference of Constant Sample-averaged Q-Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.