Instance-Dependent Confidence and Early Stopping for Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Various algorithms for reinforcement learning (RL) exhibit dramatic variation in their convergence rates as a function of problem structure. Such problem-dependent behavior is not captured by worst-case analyses and has accordingly inspired a growing effort in obtaining instance-dependent guarantees and deriving instance-optimal algorithms for RL problems. This research has been carried out, however, primarily within the confines of theory, providing guarantees that explain textitex post the performance differences observed. A natural next step is to convert these theoretical guarantees into guidelines that are useful in practice. We address the problem of obtaining sharp instance-dependent confidence regions for the policy evaluation problem and the optimal value estimation problem of an MDP, given access to an instance-optimal algorithm. As a consequence, we propose a data-dependent stopping rule for instance-optimal algorithms. The proposed stopping rule adapts to the instance-specific difficulty of the problem and allows for early termination for problems with favorable structure.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2022.
Builds on
17 of 41 references.
References · 17
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
- 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,401
- 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,327
- 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
- 2019Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Ataricited by 495
- 2018A Finite Time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning With Linear Function Approximationcited by 225
- 2019Tighter Problem-Dependent Regret Bounds in Reinforcement Learning without Domain Knowledge using Value Function Boundscited by 194
- 2019Non-Asymptotic Gap-Dependent Regret Bounds for Tabular MDPscited by 104
- 2020Sample Complexity of Asynchronous Q-Learning: Sharper Analysis and Variance Reductioncited by 93
- 2019Stochastic approximation with cone-contractive operators: Sharp ℓ_∞-bounds for Q-learningcited by 74
- 2019Variance-reduced Q-learning is minimax optimalcited by 72
- 2017Variance Reduced Value Iteration and Faster Algorithms for Solving Markov Decision Processescited by 56
5 more
- 2020Is Temporal Difference Learning Optimal? An Instance-Dependent Analysiscited by 41
- 2021Optimal policy evaluation using kernel-based temporal difference methodscited by 24
- 2020Reanalysis of Variance Reduced Temporal Difference Learningcited by 23
- 2021Instance-optimality in optimal value estimation: Adaptivity via variance-reduced Q-learningcited by 21
- 2020ROOT-SGD: Sharp Nonasymptotics and Near-Optimal Asymptotics in a Single Algorithmcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2.
5 papers.
- 2023Optimal Sample Complexity of Stable Discounted Markov Decision Processescited by 6
- 2022Stabilizing Q-learning with Linear Architectures for Provably Efficient Learningcited by 5
- 2023A Framework for History-Aware Hyperparameter Optimisation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2024Enhancing Stochastic Optimization for Statistical Efficiency Using ROOT-SGD with Diminishing Stepsizecited by 0
- 2024To bootstrap or to rollout? An optimal and adaptive interpolationcited by 0
- 2024To bootstrap or to rollout? An optimal and adaptive interpolation14 Nov 2024
- 2024Enhancing Stochastic Optimization for Statistical Efficiency Using ROOT-SGD with Diminishing Stepsize15 Jul 2024
- 2023A Framework for History-Aware Hyperparameter Optimisation in Reinforcement Learning9 Mar 2023
- 2023Optimal Sample Complexity of Stable Discounted Markov Decision Processes15 Feb 2023
- 2022Stabilizing Q-learning with Linear Architectures for Provably Efficient Learning1 Jun 2022