mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Regret and Sample Complexity of Online Q-Learning via Concentration of Stochastic Approximation with Time-Inhomogeneous Markov Chains

arXiv 2602.16274 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present the first regret bound for classical online Q-learning in infinite-horizon discounted Markov decision processes (MDPs), without relying on optimism or bonus terms. We first analyze Boltzmann Q-learning with decaying temperature and show that its regret depends critically on the suboptimality gap of the MDP: for sufficiently large gaps, the regret is sublinear, while for small gaps it deteriorates and can approach linear growth. To address this limitation, we study a Smoothed εn-Greedy exploration scheme that combines εn-greedy and Boltzmann exploration, for which we prove a gap-robust regret bound of near-tildeO(N9/10). We also obtain sample complexity guarantees, with both regret and sample complexity bounds holding with high probability. To analyze these algorithms, we develop a high-probability concentration bound for contractive Markovian stochastic approximation with iterate- and time-dependent transition dynamics. This bound may be of independent interest as the contraction factor in our framework is allowed to converge to one asymptotically.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2026.

Builds on

22 of 38 references.

References · 22

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  3. 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
  4. 2019Reinforcement Learning in Healthcare: A Surveycited by 308
  5. 2019Finite-Time Error Bounds For Linear Stochastic Approximation and TD Learningcited by 165
  6. 2020Finite-Time Analysis of Asynchronous Stochastic Approximation and Q-Learningcited by 93
  7. 2020Sample Complexity of Asynchronous Q-Learning: Sharper Analysis and Variance Reductioncited by 93
  8. 2021Is Q-Learning Minimax Optimal? A Tight Sample Complexity Analysiscited by 89
  9. 2019Stochastic approximation with cone-contractive operators: Sharp ℓ_∞-bounds for Q-learningcited by 74
  10. 2019Variance-reduced Q-learning is minimax optimalcited by 72
  11. 2017Boltzmann Exploration Done Rightcited by 69
  12. 2020Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Discounted MDPscited by 42
10 more
  1. 2023Concentration of Contractive Stochastic Approximation: Additive and Multiplicative Noisecited by 26
  2. 2021Concentration of Contractive Stochastic Approximation and Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
  3. 2020Regret Bounds for Discounted MDPscited by 19
  4. 2023A Concentration Bound for TD(0) with Function Approximationcited by 10
  5. 2024Almost Sure Convergence Rates and Concentration of Stochastic Approximation and Reinforcement Learning with Markovian Noisecited by 10
  6. 2022Final Iteration Convergence Bound of Q-Learning: Switching System Approachcited by 9
  7. 2025Finite-Time Bounds for Two-Time-Scale Stochastic Approximation with Arbitrary Norm Contractions and Markovian Noisecited by 9
  8. 2023Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning for Discounted MDPs with Short Burn-In Timecited by 8
  9. 2025A Minimal-Assumption Analysis of Q-Learning with Time-Varying Policiescited by 3
  10. 2022Slowly Changing Adversarial Bandit Algorithms are Efficient for Discounted MDPscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.