Regret and Sample Complexity of Online Q-Learning via Concentration of Stochastic Approximation with Time-Inhomogeneous Markov Chains
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present the first regret bound for classical online Q-learning in infinite-horizon discounted Markov decision processes (MDPs), without relying on optimism or bonus terms. We first analyze Boltzmann Q-learning with decaying temperature and show that its regret depends critically on the suboptimality gap of the MDP: for sufficiently large gaps, the regret is sublinear, while for small gaps it deteriorates and can approach linear growth. To address this limitation, we study a Smoothed εn-Greedy exploration scheme that combines εn-greedy and Boltzmann exploration, for which we prove a gap-robust regret bound of near-tildeO(N9/10). We also obtain sample complexity guarantees, with both regret and sample complexity bounds holding with high probability. To analyze these algorithms, we develop a high-probability concentration bound for contractive Markovian stochastic approximation with iterate- and time-dependent transition dynamics. This bound may be of independent interest as the contraction factor in our framework is allowed to converge to one asymptotically.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2026.
Builds on
22 of 38 references.
References · 22
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
- 2019Reinforcement Learning in Healthcare: A Surveycited by 308
- 2019Finite-Time Error Bounds For Linear Stochastic Approximation and TD Learningcited by 165
- 2020Finite-Time Analysis of Asynchronous Stochastic Approximation and Q-Learningcited by 93
- 2020Sample Complexity of Asynchronous Q-Learning: Sharper Analysis and Variance Reductioncited by 93
- 2021Is Q-Learning Minimax Optimal? A Tight Sample Complexity Analysiscited by 89
- 2019Stochastic approximation with cone-contractive operators: Sharp ℓ_∞-bounds for Q-learningcited by 74
- 2019Variance-reduced Q-learning is minimax optimalcited by 72
- 2017Boltzmann Exploration Done Rightcited by 69
- 2020Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Discounted MDPscited by 42
10 more
- 2023Concentration of Contractive Stochastic Approximation: Additive and Multiplicative Noisecited by 26
- 2021Concentration of Contractive Stochastic Approximation and Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
- 2020Regret Bounds for Discounted MDPscited by 19
- 2023A Concentration Bound for TD(0) with Function Approximationcited by 10
- 2024Almost Sure Convergence Rates and Concentration of Stochastic Approximation and Reinforcement Learning with Markovian Noisecited by 10
- 2022Final Iteration Convergence Bound of Q-Learning: Switching System Approachcited by 9
- 2025Finite-Time Bounds for Two-Time-Scale Stochastic Approximation with Arbitrary Norm Contractions and Markovian Noisecited by 9
- 2023Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning for Discounted MDPs with Short Burn-In Timecited by 8
- 2025A Minimal-Assumption Analysis of Q-Learning with Time-Varying Policiescited by 3
- 2022Slowly Changing Adversarial Bandit Algorithms are Efficient for Discounted MDPscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.