Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning for Discounted MDPs with Short Burn-In Time
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A crucial problem in reinforcement learning is learning the optimal policy. We study this in tabular infinite-horizon discounted Markov decision processes under the online setting. The existing algorithms either fail to achieve regret optimality or have to incur a high memory and computational cost. In addition, existing optimal algorithms all require a long burn-in time in order to achieve optimal sample efficiency, i.e., their optimality is not guaranteed unless sample size surpasses a high threshold. We address both open problems by introducing a model-free algorithm that employs variance reduction and a novel technique that switches the execution policy in a slow-yet-adaptive manner. This is the first regret-optimal model-free algorithm in the discounted setting, with the additional benefit of a low burn-in time.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2023.
Builds on
33 of 49 references.
References · 33
- 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 500
- 2017SARAH: A Novel Method for Machine Learning Problems Using Stochastic Recursive Gradientcited by 218
- 2020Almost Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning via Reference-Advantage Decompositioncited by 127
- 2019Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model is Minimax Optimalcited by 124
- 2021Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation Under Adaptivity Constraintscited by 124
- 2020Breaking the Sample Size Barrier in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Modelcited by 108
- 2018Stochastic Variance-Reduced Policy Gradientcited by 103
- 2020Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Discounted MDPs with Feature Mappingcited by 102
- 2020Sample Complexity of Asynchronous Q-Learning: Sharper Analysis and Variance Reductioncited by 93
- 2022Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards Optimal Sample Complexitycited by 84
- 2014A Proximal Stochastic Gradient Method with Progressive Variance Reductioncited by 78
- 2019Provably Efficient Q-Learning with Low Switching Costcited by 77
21 more
- 2019Variance-reduced Q-learning is minimax optimalcited by 72
- 2021On the Convergence and Sample Efficiency of Variance-Reduced Policy Gradient Methodcited by 67
- 2022An Improved Analysis of (Variance-Reduced) Policy Gradient and Natural Policy Gradient Methodscited by 63
- 2020Q-learning with Logarithmic Regretcited by 59
- 2017Stochastic Variance Reduction Methods for Policy Evaluationcited by 56
- 2017Variance Reduced Value Iteration and Faster Algorithms for Solving Markov Decision Processescited by 56
- 2021Near-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning via Double Variance Reductioncited by 56
- 2019Q-learning with UCB Exploration is Sample Efficient for Infinite-Horizon MDPcited by 53
- 2021Breaking the Sample Complexity Barrier to Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 51
- 2021UCB Momentum Q-learning: Correcting the bias without forgettingcited by 45
- 2020Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Discounted MDPscited by 42
- 2022The Efficacy of Pessimism in Asynchronous Q-Learningcited by 41
- 2021A Provably Efficient Algorithm for Linear Markov Decision Process with Low Switching Costcited by 38
- 2022Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with loglog(T) Switching Costcited by 32
- 2020Model-Free Reinforcement Learning: from Clipped Pseudo-Regret to Sample Complexitycited by 28
- 2020Reanalysis of Variance Reduced Temporal Difference Learningcited by 23
- 2018Near-Optimal Time and Sample Complexities for Solving Discounted Markov Decision Process with a Generative Modelcited by 22
- 2020Regret Bounds for Discounted MDPscited by 19
- 2019Stabilized SVRG: Simple Variance Reduction for Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 15
- 2022Near-Optimal Regret Bounds for Multi-batch Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
- 2017Randomized Linear Programming Solves the Discounted Markov Decision Problem In Nearly-Linear (Sometimes Sublinear) Running Timecited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2023Settling the Sample Complexity of Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 44
- 2024Reinforcement Learning for Infinite-Horizon Average-Reward Linear MDPs via Approximation by Discounted-Reward MDPscited by 7
- 2025Emoti-Attack: Zero-Perturbation Adversarial Attacks on NLP Systems via Emoji Sequencescited by 5
- 2024Near-Optimal Reinforcement Learning with Self-Play under Adaptivity Constraintscited by 3
- 2024Enhancing Classification Performance via Reinforcement Learning for Feature Selectioncited by 2
- 2025Statistical and Algorithmic Foundations of Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
- 2026Regret and Sample Complexity of Online Q-Learning via Concentration of Stochastic Approximation with Time-Inhomogeneous Markov Chainscited by 1
- 2026Optimal Variance-Dependent Regret Bounds for Infinite-Horizon MDPscited by 0
- 2026Optimal Variance-Dependent Regret Bounds for Infinite-Horizon MDPs25 Mar 2026
- 2026Regret and Sample Complexity of Online Q-Learning via Concentration of Stochastic Approximation with Time-Inhomogeneous Markov Chains18 Feb 2026
- 2025Statistical and Algorithmic Foundations of Reinforcement Learning19 Jul 2025
- 2025Emoti-Attack: Zero-Perturbation Adversarial Attacks on NLP Systems via Emoji Sequences24 Feb 2025
- 2024Reinforcement Learning for Infinite-Horizon Average-Reward Linear MDPs via Approximation by Discounted-Reward MDPs23 May 2024
- 2024Enhancing Classification Performance via Reinforcement Learning for Feature Selection9 Mar 2024
- 2024Near-Optimal Reinforcement Learning with Self-Play under Adaptivity Constraints2 Feb 2024
- 2023Settling the Sample Complexity of Online Reinforcement Learning25 Jul 2023