Beyond End-to-End Black Box Mapping: An Intentional Agent Framework for Cognitive-driven Facial Reaction Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automatic human-like facial reaction generation (FRG) is essential for building intelligent systems that can engage in human-computer interaction (HCI). While diverse and context-appropriate facial reactions can reflect latent appraisal and affective processes in human interaction, most existing FRG methods rely on end-to-end architectures that directly map speaker behaviours to listener expressions without an explicit intermediate internal state. We reformulate FRG as generation mediated by a structured internal-state process and propose the Intentional Agent, which shifts FRG from direct stimulus-response mapping to stimulus-grounded generation through explicit intermediate states. To represent temporal internal-state evolution, we propose an internal dynamics model that integrates emotional drives with an iterative Inner Thought Flow (ITF) within a structured intermediate state used for subsequent generation. This state can continue to update during conversational silences. Furthermore, to bridge abstract internal states with physiological actions, we formulate FRG as a downstream affective mapping from this latent thought flow to facial expressions. Experiments on the REACT 2025 dataset show an FRDist of 72.39 and an FRDiv of 0.5057; perceptual plausibility is evaluated separately through blinded human ratings. A blinded human evaluation of 96 reactions found no significant difference in mean score between Full and ground truth (5.527 vs. 5.195, pHolm=.076), while Full significantly outperformed Event-Triggered and Heuristic-Only (both pHolm<.001). The Reaction Quality Scorer (RQS) correlated strongly with human judgements (Pearson r=.855; Spearman ρ=.821, both p<.05), supporting its use as an automatic metric. These results underscore the immense potential of endogenous dynamics in building highly autonomous, human-like agents.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.
Builds on
36 of 82 references.
References · 36
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
- 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Modelscited by 1,057
- 2020Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videoscited by 631
- 2022SadTalker: Learning Realistic 3D Motion Coefficients for Stylized Audio-Driven Single Image Talking Face Animationcited by 380
- 2025Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challengescited by 194
- 2019Realistic Speech-Driven Facial Animation with GANscited by 142
- 2022Learning to Listen: Modeling Non-Deterministic Dyadic Facial Motioncited by 125
- 2024Proactive Agent: Shifting LLM Agents from Reactive Responses to Active Assistancecited by 84
- 2022EmoBank: Studying the Impact of Annotation Perspective and Representation Format on Dimensional Emotion Analysiscited by 75
24 more
- 2025Measuring What Makes You Unique: Difference-Aware User Modeling for Enhancing LLM Personalizationcited by 44
- 2023Can Language Models Learn to Listen?cited by 40
- 2024Proactive Conversational Agents with Inner Thoughtscited by 35
- 2025DualTalk: Dual-Speaker Interaction for 3D Talking Head Conversationscited by 31
- 2025ARTalk: Speech-Driven 3D Head Animation via Autoregressive Modelcited by 28
- 2025NRC VAD Lexicon v2: Norms for Valence, Arousal, and Dominance for over 55k English Termscited by 25
- 2023ReactFace: Online Multiple Appropriate Facial Reaction Generation in Dyadic Interactionscited by 17
- 2023Emotional Listener Portrait: Neural Listener Head Generation with Emotioncited by 17
- 2023Multiple Appropriate Facial Reaction Generation in Dyadic Interaction Settings: What, Why and How?cited by 16
- 2023Does GPT-4 surpass human performance in linguistic pragmatics?cited by 16
- 2024REACT 2024: the Second Multiple Appropriate Facial Reaction Generation Challengecited by 16
- 2025ProactiveVA: Proactive Visual Analytics with LLM-Based UI Agentcited by 14
- 2023Reversible Graph Neural Network-based Reaction Distribution Learning for Multiple Appropriate Facial Reactions Generationcited by 11
- 2025CodingGenie: A Proactive LLM-Powered Programming Assistantcited by 10
- 2025REACT 2025: the Third Multiple Appropriate Facial Reaction Generation Challengecited by 9
- 2025MagicFace: High-Fidelity Facial Expression Editing with Action-Unit Controlcited by 7
- 2024CAGE: Circumplex Affect Guided Expression Inferencecited by 6
- 2025HyPerAlign: Interpretable Personalized LLM Alignment via Hypothesis Generationcited by 6
- 2025Latent Behavior Diffusion for Sequential Reaction Generation in Dyadic Settingcited by 3
- 2025Overhearing LLM Agents: A Survey, Taxonomy, and Roadmapcited by 3
- 2024"You are an expert annotator": Automatic Best-Worst-Scaling Annotations for Emotion Intensity Modelingcited by 2
- 2025Multimodal Quantitative Measures for Multiparty Behaviour Evaluationcited by 2
- 2025Empathic Prompting: Non-Verbal Context Integration for Multimodal LLM Conversationscited by 2
- 2026Controlled Face Manipulation and Synthesis for Data Augmentationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.