MatrAIx: Simulating the World with 8.3 Billion Persona Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate
Abstract (arXiv)
Human evaluation of AI systems and digital products is costly, slow, and difficult to scale. Offline evaluations are more scalable but often abstract away human diversity and interactive behavior. We therefore introduce MatrAIx, a population-scale simulated-user evaluation infrastructure for testing AI systems and digital products with heterogeneous users. MatrAIx has three core components: First, Persona 8B contains 8.3 billion persona records represented by 1,290 categorical dimensions. Records are either sampled from a dependency graph that preserves correlated attributes or derived from human-authored profiles. We release a quality-filtered coreset of approximately 1 million personas, comprising 599,847 human-grounded and 400,000 synthetic records. Second, the MatrAIx Playground provides four environments in which diverse users evaluate and interact with digital products: Survey, AI Chatbot, Web, and App. Third, MatrAIx provides 1,010 application tasks spanning more than 25 domains, including Commerce, Software, Finance, and Healthcare. We conducted 18,189 evaluation trials across eight representative tasks. Persona agents were powered by three LLMs: Claude Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5, and Claude Haiku 4.5. The resulting feedback captures how decisions and preferences vary across persona backgrounds, including hesitation after a price increase, willingness to continue after an AI assistant fails, and latency tolerance. We conducted two main validation studies: First, a 400-trial controlled study evaluated persona adherence across ten behavioral attributes and all four environments. The declared behavior was expressed or correctly suppressed in 366 trials (91.5%). Second, human and LLM judges evaluated the extraction quality of human-grounded personas. Overall, MatrAIx provides an end-to-end infrastructure for evaluating AI systems and digital products with diverse simulated human users.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 53 of its 107 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.
Builds on
53 of 107 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Mind the Sim2Real Gap in User Simulation for Agentic Tasks11 Mar
- 2025AgentSociety: Large-Scale Simulation of LLM-Driven Generative Agents Advances Understanding of Human Behaviors and Society12 Feb
- 2024LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individuals15 Nov
- 2024CharacterGPT: A Persona Reconstruction Framework for Role-Playing Agents30 May
- 2023Generative agent-based modeling with actions grounded in physical, social, or digital space using Concordia6 Dec
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior7 Apr
Other references · 47
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
- 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,210
- 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,197
- 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,134
- 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
35 more
- 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 820
- 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 759
- 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 737
- 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 598
- 2023LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation Datasetcited by 449
- 2024Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personascited by 397
- 2024AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agentscited by 359
- 2023SOTOPIA: Interactive Evaluation for Social Intelligence in Language Agentscited by 350
- 2023Prediction-Powered Inferencecited by 214
- 2023InCharacter: Evaluating Personality Fidelity in Role-Playing Agents through Psychological Interviewscited by 177
- 2025Multi-SWE-bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Issue Resolvingcited by 165
- 2024Large language models that replace human participants can harmfully misportray and flatten identity groupscited by 137
- 2024The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 136
- 2024OASIS: Open Agent Social Interaction Simulations with One Million Agentscited by 127
- 2018Training Millions of Personalized Dialogue Agentscited by 126
- 2025SWE-Lancer: Can Frontier LLMs Earn 1 Million from Real-World Freelance Software Engineering?cited by 99
- 2025PersonaMem-v2: Towards Personalized Intelligence via Learning Implicit User Personas and Agentic Memorycited by 82
- 2025SWE-bench Goes Live!cited by 74
- 2024Random Silicon Sampling: Simulating Human Sub-Population Opinion Using a Large Language Model Based on Group-Level Demographic Informationcited by 48
- 2024Evaluating Large Language Models as Generative User Simulators for Conversational Recommendationcited by 45
- 2025SimulatorArena: Are User Simulators Reliable Proxies for Multi-Turn Evaluation of AI Assistants?cited by 45
- 2018Neural User Simulation for Corpus-based Policy Optimisation for Spoken Dialogue Systemscited by 42
- 2025Know You First and Be You Better: Modeling Human-Like User Simulators via Implicit Profilescited by 38
- 2018User Modeling for Task Oriented Dialoguescited by 36
- 2025ChatBench: From Static Benchmarks to Human-AI Evaluationcited by 31
- 2025CARES: Comprehensive Evaluation of Safety and Adversarial Robustness in Medical LLMscited by 26
- 2025How Far are LLMs from Being Our Digital Twins? A Benchmark for Persona-Based Behavior Chain Simulationcited by 21
- 2026TeamBench: Evaluating Agent Coordination under Enforced Role Separationcited by 8
- 2024Personalizing Prostate Cancer Education for Patients Using an EHR-Integrated LLM Agentcited by 7
- 2025"What's Up, Doc?": Analyzing How Users Seek Health Information in Large-Scale Conversational AI Datasetscited by 5
- 2025ENCORE: Entropy-guided Reward Composition for Multi-head Safety Reward Modelscited by 4
- 2025The MedPerturb Dataset: What Non-Content Perturbations Reveal About Human and Clinical LLM Decision Makingcited by 4
- 2026ADK Arena: Evaluating Agent Development Kits via LLM-as-a-Developercited by 2
- 2026Automating SKILL.md Generation for Computer-Using Agents via Interaction Trajectory Miningcited by 2
- 2026CurveShift: Is Agent Progress Scalar? Separating Level from Shapecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Benchmark Radar: A Living Database and Search Engine for AI Benchmarks and Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Are Human-Aligned Models Models of Humans? A Turing-Test Gap in Preference Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026SocioVerse2: A Longitudinal Dynamic Social Simulation Framework under a Human-AI Co-evolutionary Paradigmcited by 0
- 2026Screen Before You Serve: Simulation for Production Customer Experience AI Agents at 140M Scalecited by 0
- 2026From Preference to Reciprocity: Decentralized Matching with Empirically Grounded LLM-agent Based Modelingcited by 0
- 2026From Preference to Reciprocity: Decentralized Matching with Empirically Grounded LLM-agent Based Modeling28 Sep 2026
- 2026Screen Before You Serve: Simulation for Production Customer Experience AI Agents at 140M Scale24 Sep 2026
- 2026SocioVerse2: A Longitudinal Dynamic Social Simulation Framework under a Human-AI Co-evolutionary Paradigm21 Sep 2026
- 2026Are Human-Aligned Models Models of Humans? A Turing-Test Gap in Preference Alignment20 Sep 2026
- 2026Benchmark Radar: A Living Database and Search Engine for AI Benchmarks and Evaluation10 Sep 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026A Three-Tier Persona Vector for Controllable User Simulation in Agentic Evaluation
- 2024PersonaGym: Evaluating Persona Agents and LLMs
- 2026How to Model AI Agents as Personas?: Applying the Persona Ecosystem Playground to 41,300 Posts on Moltbook for Behavioral Insights
- 2026Data-Driven Persona-Conditioned Agents for A/B Test Simulation
- 2026AgentWorld: Personality-Aware Reliability Evaluation for Agentic Information Retrieval
- 2026PersonaForge: Realistic Multi-Turn User Simulation for Agentic Systems
- 2025Free Lunch for User Experience: Crowdsourcing Agents for Scalable User Studies
- 2025PAARS: Persona Aligned Agentic Retail Shoppers