Screen Before You Serve: Simulation for Production Customer Experience AI Agents at 140M Scale
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents also fits: Social simulation and multi-agent debate
Abstract (arXiv)
Customer experience (CX) agents use tools and large language models to address customer requests and guide conversational interactions with an organization's products. Improving these agents, especially in regulated industries, is difficult: they must detect intent, follow complex operational policies and use tools reliably. Manual end-to-end testing offers limited coverage, while live experiments expose customers to failures that can erode trust. We present a hypothesis-driven simulation workflow for screening candidate CX agents before deployment. Synthetic customers react to agent responses and simulated tool outputs enable multi-step agentic workflows without invoking production backends. We use the Snowglobe simulator on Nubank's Card Delivery agent and its expanded successor, Card Management - Nubank's highest-volume chat-support agent in Brazil. Across 4 deployed versions, simulated and production version-level binary evaluator scores show high correlation. Simulation-guided iteration increased transactional net promoter score (tNPS) by 36.69 points in a live A/B test. We also screened open-weight configurations in over 16,000 simulated conversations. In a subsequent live A/B test, the selected model increased self-service rate (SSR) by 8.82 percentage points to the highest level observed at Nubank, with no statistically significant change in tNPS. Simulation made broad exploration of models, reasoning settings, and prompts feasible without customer exposure, enabling production improvements that would have been impractical to pursue through live experimentation alone.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 28 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2026.
Builds on
28 of 39 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2025CRMArena-Pro: Holistic Assessment of LLM Agents Across Diverse Business Scenarios and Interactions24 May
Other references · 27
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,947
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,402
- 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 627
- 2025GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learningcited by 542
- 2024Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personascited by 417
- 2025Agentic Misalignment: How LLMs Could Be Insider Threatscited by 158
- 2024The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 144
15 more
- 2025UserBench: An Interactive Gym Environment for User-Centric Agentscited by 76
- 2025OpenAgentSafety: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Real-World AI Agent Safetycited by 75
- 2025Flipping the Dialogue: Training and Evaluating User Language Modelscited by 58
- 2025SimulatorArena: Are User Simulators Reliable Proxies for Multi-Turn Evaluation of AI Assistants?cited by 50
- 2026Nemotron 3 Super: Open, Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Model for Agentic Reasoningcited by 38
- 2023User Simulation for Evaluating Information Access Systemscited by 31
- 2024How Reliable is Your Simulator? Analysis on the Limitations of Current LLM-based User Simulators for Conversational Recommendationcited by 27
- 2025Goal Alignment in LLM-Based User Simulators for Conversational AIcited by 21
- 2025LLM-Friendly Knowledge Representation for Customer Supportcited by 12
- 2026RealUserSim: Bridging the Reality Gap in Agent Benchmarking via Grounded User Simulationcited by 12
- 2026LLMs Get Lost in Evolving User Intentcited by 10
- 2026MatrAIx: Simulating the World with 8.3 Billion Persona Agentscited by 7
- 2025A Practical Approach for Building Production-Grade Conversational Agents with Workflow Graphscited by 4
- 2026ROGUE: Evaluating Corrigibility Failures in Frontier Computer-Use Agentscited by 3
- 2026Building Customer Support AI Agents at 100M-User Scale: An Evaluation-Driven Frameworkcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Redefining CX with Agentic AI: Minerva CQ Case Study
- 2026Can AI Agents Simulate A/B Test Outcomes? A Validation Framework for Agentic Experimentation
- 2026Simulated Customers Never Walk Away: Decision Fidelity of LLM User Simulators Measured Against Real Purchase Outcomes
- 2026SimGym: Traffic-Grounded Browser Agents for Offline A/B Testing in E-Commerce
- 2026On Evaluating and Improving Conversational Agents in Production
- 2026StoreBench: A Live-Commerce Environment for Evaluating and Training Autonomous Operator Agents
- 2026SimGym: A Framework for A/B Test Simulation in E-Commerce with Traffic-Grounded VLM Agents
- 2026Interview-Informed Generative Agents for Product Discovery: A Validation Study