mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LEMUR: Learning to Align with Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning from Preference Feedback

arXiv 2607.29559 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2026cs.AI cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning (RL) systems are typically trained using a single, well-specified scalar reward function. However, real-world decision-making tasks often involve multiple, competing objectives, such as performance versus efficiency, where ground-truth reward functions are difficult to specify or inaccessible. While Multi-Objective RL (MORL) addresses such trade-offs by modeling rewards as vectors, existing approaches typically assume access to a well-specified reward function for each objective, inheriting the same challenges faced by single-objective RL. Meanwhile, Preference-based RL (PbRL) has shown great potential in solving complex tasks without access to a pre-defined reward function through reward learning from human feedback, yet has largely been studied in single-objective settings. In this work, we bridge this gap with LEMUR: Learning to Align with Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning with Preference feedback, a novel framework where an agent interactively learns from the preferences of multiple humans to learn optimal multi-objective policies. Our approach jointly learns policies and multiple objective-specific reward models from human feedback, enabling agents to effectively balance competing objectives during learning. We evaluate LEMUR on a variety of benchmark multi-objective tasks, and empirical results demonstrate its superior performance over baseline methods. Our method presents a promising direction for solving multi-objective decision-making tasks without pre-defined reward functions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 40 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.

Builds on

40 of 62 references.

Closest ancestors · 13

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Stackelberg Learning from Human Feedback: Preference Optimization as a Sequential Game18 Dec
  2. 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF13 May
  3. 2024Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference Model11 Feb
  4. 2023Distributional Preference Learning: Understanding and Accounting for Hidden Context in RLHF13 Dec
  5. 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversity10 Oct
  6. 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewards7 Jun
  7. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training2 Jun
  8. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  9. 2023Benchmarks and Algorithms for Offline Preference-Based Reward Learning3 Jan
  10. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization19 Oct
  11. 2021PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training9 Jun
  12. 2018Reward learning from human preferences and demonstrations in Atari15 Nov
1 more
  1. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 27

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  3. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  4. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  5. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
  6. 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,204
  7. 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 821
  8. 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 366
  9. 2018Sim-to-Real: Learning Agile Locomotion For Quadruped Robotscited by 319
  10. 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 256
  11. 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 242
  12. 2022Fine-tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferencescited by 189
15 more
  1. 2019A Generalized Algorithm for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Policy Adaptationcited by 177
  2. 2021B-Pref: Benchmarking Preference-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 106
  3. 2024Vision Language Models are In-Context Value Learnerscited by 90
  4. 2026Rethinking Rubric Generation for Improving LLM Judge and Reward Modeling for Open-ended Taskscited by 62
  5. 2017Hybrid Reward Architecture for Reinforcement Learningcited by 58
  6. 2021Scalar reward is not enough: A response to Silver, Singh, Precup and Sutton (2021)cited by 55
  7. 2020A Distributional View on Multi-Objective Policy Optimizationcited by 52
  8. 2022Inferring Rewards from Language in Contextcited by 50
  9. 2023Scaling Pareto-Efficient Decision Making Via Offline Multi-Objective RLcited by 36
  10. 2018Meta-Learning for Multi-objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 34
  11. 2021MORAL: Aligning AI with Human Norms through Multi-Objective Reinforced Active Learningcited by 25
  12. 2020Multi-Principal Assistance Gamescited by 10
  13. 2025On Generalization Across Environments In Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
  14. 2026Vector Policy Optimization: Training for Diversity Improves Test-Time Searchcited by 8
  15. 2026Learning to Drive in New Cities Without Human Demonstrationscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Reward-Free Viewpoint on Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2025Learning Pareto-Optimal Rewards from Noisy Preferences: A Framework for Multi-Objective Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective
  4. 2025Preference-based Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2026Preference Conditioned Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning: Decomposed, Diversity-Driven Policy Optimization
  6. 2026Reward-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2022Reward Uncertainty for Exploration in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026Balancing Multiple Objectives in Urban Traffic Control with Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback