mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rethinking LLM-Based RTL Code Optimization Via Timing Logic Metamorphosis

arXiv 2507.16808 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2025cs.SE cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Register Transfer Level(RTL) code optimization is crucial for achieving high performance and low power consumption in digital circuit design. However, traditional optimization methods often rely on manual tuning and heuristics, which can be time-consuming and error-prone. Recent studies proposed to leverage Large Language Models(LLMs) to assist in RTL code optimization. LLMs can generate optimized code snippets based on natural language descriptions, potentially speeding up the optimization process. However, existing approaches have not thoroughly evaluated the effectiveness of LLM-Based code optimization methods for RTL code with complex timing logic. To address this gap, we conducted a comprehensive empirical investigation to assess the capability of LLM-Based RTL code optimization methods in handling RTL code with complex timing logic. In this study, we first propose a new benchmark for RTL optimization evaluation. It comprises four subsets, each corresponding to a specific area of RTL code optimization. Then we introduce a method based on metamorphosis to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of LLM-Based RTL code optimization methods.Our key insight is that the optimization effectiveness should remain consistent for semantically equivalent but more complex code. After intensive experiments, we revealed several key findings. (1) LLM-Based RTL optimization methods can effectively optimize logic operations and outperform existing compiler-based methods. (2) LLM-Based RTL optimization methods do not perform better than existing compiler-based methods on RTL code with complex timing logic, particularly in timing control flow optimization and clock domain optimization. This is primarily attributed to the challenges LLMs face in understanding timing logic in RTL code. Based on these findings, we provide insights for further research in leveraging LLMs for RTL code optimization.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2025.

Builds on

22 of 68 references.

References · 22

  1. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  2. 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,139
  3. 2023VerilogEval: Evaluating Large Language Models for Verilog Code Generationcited by 252
  4. 2023VeriGen: A Large Language Model for Verilog Code Generationcited by 200
  5. 2023RTLLM: An Open-Source Benchmark for Design RTL Generation with Large Language Modelcited by 148
  6. 2023Learning Performance-Improving Code Editscited by 106
  7. 2023RTLFixer: Automatically Fixing RTL Syntax Errors with Large Language Modelscited by 100
  8. 2023SpikingBERT: Distilling BERT to Train Spiking Language Models Using Implicit Differentiationcited by 48
  9. 2020Semantic Robustness of Models of Source Codecited by 45
  10. 2024Meta Large Language Model Compiler: Foundation Models of Compiler Optimizationcited by 39
  11. 2024RTLRewriter: Methodologies for Large Models aided RTL Code Optimizationcited by 31
  12. 2025ChronoSense: Exploring Temporal Understanding in Large Language Models with Time Intervals of Eventscited by 18
10 more
  1. 2025SymRTLO: Enhancing RTL Code Optimization with LLMs and Neuron-Inspired Symbolic Reasoningcited by 16
  2. 2025Language Models for Code Optimization: Survey, Challenges and Future Directionscited by 15
  3. 2025VeriCoder: Enhancing LLM-Based RTL Code Generation through Functional Correctness Validationcited by 13
  4. 2023Learning Compiler Pass Orders using Coreset and Normalized Value Predictioncited by 11
  5. 2023Exploiting Code Symmetries for Learning Program Semanticscited by 10
  6. 2024Priority Sampling of Large Language Models for Compilerscited by 8
  7. 2024A Novel HDL Code Generator for Effectively Testing FPGA Logic Synthesis Compilerscited by 3
  8. 2019Optimizing and Evaluating Transient Gradual Typingcited by 1
  9. 2020Efficient Binary-Level Coverage Analysiscited by 1
  10. 2025Iterating Pointers: Enabling Static Analysis for Loop-based Pointerscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Understanding and Mitigating Errors of LLM-Generated RTL Code
  2. 2026LLM4RTL: Tool-Assisted LLM for RTL Generation
  3. 2025Faver: Boosting LLM-based RTL Generation with Function Abstracted Verifiable Middleware
  4. 2026StepPRM-RTL: Stepwise Process-Reward Guided LLM Fine-Tuning for Enhanced RTL Synthesis
  5. 2026LLM-FSM: Scaling Large Language Models for Finite-State Reasoning in RTL Code Generation
  6. 2024New Solutions on LLM Acceleration, Optimization, and Application
  7. 2026AUTOGATE: Automated Clock Gating via Toggling-Aware LLM-based RTL Rewriting
  8. 2026LongRTL: Graph-Similarity-Guided LLM-driven Long Context RTL Optimization ↗