mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Automated Capability Discovery via Foundation Model Self-Exploration

arXiv 2502.07577 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Foundation models have become general-purpose assistants, exhibiting diverse capabilities across numerous domains through training on web-scale data. It remains challenging to precisely characterize even a fraction of the full spectrum of these abilities and potential risks in any new model. Existing evaluation approaches often require significant human effort, and it is taking increasing effort to design ever harder challenges for more capable models. We introduce Automated Capability Discovery (ACD), a framework that designates one foundation model as a scientist to systematically propose open-ended tasks probing the abilities of a subject model (potentially itself). By combining frontier models with ideas from the field of open-endedness, ACD automatically and systematically uncovers a diverse spectrum of surprising capabilities and failures in the subject model. We demonstrate ACD across a range of foundation models (including the GPT, Claude, and Llama series), showing that it automatically generates thousands of distinct tasks, which are then clustered to reveal dozens of broader capability areas and failure modes, that would be challenging for any single team to uncover. We further validate our method's automated scoring with extensive human surveys, observing high agreement between model-generated and human evaluations. By leveraging foundation models' ability to both create tasks and self-evaluate, ACD is a significant step toward scalable, automated evaluation of novel AI systems. All code and evaluation logs are open-sourced at https://github.com/conglu1997/ACD.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2025.

Builds on

45 of 65 references.

References · 45

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  6. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  7. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  8. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  9. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  10. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  11. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  12. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
33 more
  1. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  2. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  3. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  4. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
  5. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
  6. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
  7. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
  8. 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 760
  9. 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
  10. 2025Humanity's Last Examcited by 467
  11. 2015Illuminating search spaces by mapping elitescited by 406
  12. 2022Measuring Progress on Scalable Oversight for Large Language Modelscited by 212
  13. 2024Rainbow Teaming: Open-Ended Generation of Diverse Adversarial Promptscited by 189
  14. 2019Paired Open-Ended Trailblazer (POET): Endlessly Generating Increasingly Complex and Diverse Learning Environments and Their Solutionscited by 182
  15. 2024Attacks, Defenses and Evaluations for LLM Conversation Safety: A Surveycited by 124
  16. 2024AutoSurvey: Large Language Models Can Automatically Write Surveyscited by 116
  17. 2020Enhanced POET: Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning through Unbounded Invention of Learning Challenges and their Solutionscited by 103
  18. 2023DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning Taskscited by 100
  19. 2019AI-GAs: AI-generating algorithms, an alternate paradigm for producing general artificial intelligencecited by 84
  20. 2024Open-Endedness is Essential for Artificial Superhuman Intelligencecited by 79
  21. 2024OMNI-EPIC: Open-endedness via Models of human Notions of Interestingness with Environments Programmed in Codecited by 67
  22. 2023OMNI: Open-endedness via Models of human Notions of Interestingnesscited by 66
  23. 2024ALI-Agent: Assessing LLMs' Alignment with Human Values via Agent-based Evaluationcited by 46
  24. 2024Automated Red Teaming with GOAT: the Generative Offensive Agent Testercited by 41
  25. 2024Discovering Preference Optimization Algorithms with and for Large Language Modelscited by 38
  26. 2024AI-Assisted Generation of Difficult Math Questionscited by 37
  27. 2024Intelligent Go-Explore: Standing on the Shoulders of Giant Foundation Modelscited by 32
  28. 2023Augmenting Autotelic Agents with Large Language Modelscited by 29
  29. 2024Task Me Anythingcited by 29
  30. 2024International Scientific Report on the Safety of Advanced AI (Interim Report)cited by 18
  31. 2024Automated Progressive Red Teamingcited by 12
  32. 2024Boundless Socratic Learning with Language Gamescited by 12
  33. 2023ACES: Generating Diverse Programming Puzzles with with Autotelic Generative Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

8 papers.