mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Searching the Internet for Challenging Benchmarks at Scale

arXiv 2509.26619 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many static benchmarks are beginning to saturate: as models rapidly improve, they achieve near-perfect scores on fixed test sets, leaving little headroom to expose genuine model weaknesses -- and even expert-curated challenge sets quickly saturate after hillclimbing. We present a fully automatic framework that searches the Internet at scale to construct challenging benchmarks without human curation. The key insight is to model the Internet as a vast space of topics and formalize the search as a multi-armed bandit problem, where each topic's difficulty is revealed only through expensive sample-and-evaluate queries. Our epsilon-greedy strategy identifies the most challenging topics while exploring only 6% of the search space -- a 100 times cost reduction over exhaustive evaluation. We validate on machine translation and knowledge question answering, confirming that discovered difficulty is robust across independent metrics (GEMBA-SQA and MetricX), languages, and models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2025.

Builds on

16 of 43 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  2. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 420
  3. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
  4. 2023The Devil is in the Errors: Leveraging Large Language Models for Fine-grained Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 95
  5. 2019Reinforcement Learning based Curriculum Optimization for Neural Machine Translationcited by 29
  6. 2025ECLeKTic: a Novel Challenge Set for Evaluation of Cross-Lingual Knowledge Transfercited by 29
  7. 2025How to Select Datapoints for Efficient Human Evaluation of NLG Models?cited by 23
  8. 2022Not All Errors are Equal: Learning Text Generation Metrics using Stratified Error Synthesiscited by 18
  9. 2021Bandits Don't Follow Rules: Balancing Multi-Facet Machine Translation with Multi-Armed Banditscited by 16
  10. 2025Zero-shot Benchmarking: A Framework for Flexible and Scalable Automatic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 14
  11. 2025Automated Capability Discovery via Foundation Model Self-Explorationcited by 10
  12. 2022SESCORE2: Learning Text Generation Evaluation via Synthesizing Realistic Mistakescited by 9
4 more
  1. 2021Difficulty-Aware Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 6
  2. 2023A Classification-Guided Approach for Adversarial Attacks against Neural Machine Translationcited by 4
  3. 2024A Bayesian Optimization Approach to Machine Translation Rerankingcited by 2
  4. 2025Early-Exit and Instant Confidence Translation Quality Estimationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.