mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Image Matching Filtering and Refinement by Planes and Beyond

arXiv 2411.09484 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2024cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper provides a consistent and extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art filtering and refinement methods on common image matching pipelines. Unlike previous comparisons, the designed benchmark also takes into account the more general, real, and practical cases where camera intrinsics are unavailable. Moreover, a novel and effective strategy combining non-deep traditional computer vision approaches based on planar constraints and cross correlation is presented. Experimental analysis provides several insights for current application design and future research directions. In particular, the choice of a proper evaluation protocol discloses the effective differences within the compared solutions which otherwise would tend to flatten. Moreover, the proposed classical algorithmic approach is competitive with recent deep methods. Besides providing robust baseline using traditional computer vision for the evaluation of deep-based methods, this knowledge is useful to improve and better understand the deep image matching architectures. On one hand, geometry-based filtering is effective in presence of outliers without degrading already robust deep pipelines; on the other hand cross-correlation refinement is valid in the case of corner-like keypoints and allows to not directly discard inaccurate matches by default in deep pipelines but to retain and refine them for achieving a better coverage of the scene.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 120 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2024.

Builds on

58 of 120 references.

References · 58

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 20233D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Renderingcited by 6,226
  3. 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,117
  4. 2023DUSt3R: Geometric 3D Vision Made Easycited by 1,567
  5. 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,443
  6. 2017SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Descriptioncited by 1,320
  7. 2015ORB-SLAM: a Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM Systemcited by 988
  8. 2021LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformerscited by 984
  9. 2024Grounding Image Matching in 3D with MASt3Rcited by 983
  10. 2018MegaDepth: Learning Single-View Depth Prediction from Internet Photoscited by 737
  11. 2023LightGlue: Local Feature Matching at Light Speedcited by 590
  12. 2020DISK: Learning local features with policy gradientcited by 312
38 more
  1. 2016LIFT: Learned Invariant Feature Transformcited by 306
  2. 2023RoMa: Robust Dense Feature Matchingcited by 302
  3. 2017HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptorscited by 264
  4. 2019Kornia: an Open Source Differentiable Computer Vision Library for PyTorchcited by 232
  5. 2020Image Matching across Wide Baselines: From Paper to Practicecited by 225
  6. 2024A Survey on 3D Gaussian Splattingcited by 224
  7. 2024Global Structure-from-Motion Revisitedcited by 218
  8. 2017Working hard to know your neighbor's margins: Local descriptor learning losscited by 212
  9. 2019R2D2: Repeatable and Reliable Detector and Descriptorcited by 207
  10. 2021Pixel-Perfect Structure-from-Motion with Featuremetric Refinementcited by 200
  11. 2017Learning to Find Good Correspondencescited by 176
  12. 2022NeRF: Neural Radiance Field in 3D Vision: A Comprehensive Review (Updated Post-Gaussian Splatting)cited by 158
  13. 2019Learning Two-View Correspondences and Geometry Using Order-Aware Networkcited by 149
  14. 2017Graph-Cut RANSACcited by 133
  15. 2019SOSNet: Second Order Similarity Regularization for Local Descriptor Learningcited by 131
  16. 2019Neural-Guided RANSAC: Learning Where to Sample Model Hypothesescited by 129
  17. 2020Patch2Pix: Epipolar-Guided Pixel-Level Correspondencescited by 129
  18. 2022QuadTree Attention for Vision Transformerscited by 129
  19. 2022MatchFormer: Interleaving Attention in Transformers for Feature Matchingcited by 126
  20. 2018MAGSAC: marginalizing sample consensuscited by 123
  21. 2023ALIKED: A Lighter Keypoint and Descriptor Extraction Network via Deformable Transformationcited by 121
  22. 2019Key.Net: Keypoint Detection by Handcrafted and Learned CNN Filterscited by 118
  23. 2021ALIKE: Accurate and Lightweight Keypoint Detection and Descriptor Extractioncited by 77
  24. 2023DeDoDe: Detect, Don't Describe -- Describe, Don't Detect for Local Feature Matchingcited by 63
  25. 2017Repeatability Is Not Enough: Learning Affine Regions via Discriminabilitycited by 57
  26. 2021Progressive Correspondence Pruning by Consensus Learningcited by 46
  27. 2019Progressive-X: Efficient, Anytime, Multi-Model Fitting Algorithmcited by 43
  28. 2024DeDoDe v2: Analyzing and Improving the DeDoDe Keypoint Detectorcited by 39
  29. 2020D2D: Keypoint Extraction with Describe to Detect Approachcited by 34
  30. 2022Generalized Differentiable RANSACcited by 30
  31. 2022A case for using rotation invariant features in state of the art feature matcherscited by 27
  32. 2015MODS: Fast and Robust Method for Two-View Matchingcited by 26
  33. 2024Local Feature Matching Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 26
  34. 2020Single-Image Depth Prediction Makes Feature Matching Easiercited by 21
  35. 2023Steerers: A framework for rotation equivariant keypoint descriptorscited by 21
  36. 2021VSAC: Efficient and Accurate Estimator for H and Fcited by 17
  37. 2015Learning to Assign Orientations to Feature Pointscited by 16
  38. 2023A Large Scale Homography Benchmarkcited by 15

50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.