mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Deep Reinforcement Learning by Reducing the Chain Effect of Value and Policy Churn

arXiv 2409.04792 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks provide Reinforcement Learning (RL) powerful function approximators to address large-scale decision-making problems. However, these approximators introduce challenges due to the non-stationary nature of RL training. One source of the challenges in RL is that output predictions can churn, leading to uncontrolled changes after each batch update for states not included in the batch. Although such a churn phenomenon exists in each step of network training, how churn occurs and impacts RL remains under-explored. In this work, we start by characterizing churn in a view of Generalized Policy Iteration with function approximation, and we discover a chain effect of churn that leads to a cycle where the churns in value estimation and policy improvement compound and bias the learning dynamics throughout the iteration. Further, we concretize the study and focus on the learning issues caused by the chain effect in different settings, including greedy action deviation in value-based methods, trust region violation in proximal policy optimization, and dual bias of policy value in actor-critic methods. We then propose a method to reduce the chain effect across different settings, called Churn Approximated ReductIoN (CHAIN), which can be easily plugged into most existing DRL algorithms. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in both reducing churn and improving learning performance across online and offline, value-based and policy-based RL settings, as well as a scaling setting.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2024.

Builds on

55 of 68 references.

References · 55

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  4. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  5. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  6. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  7. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
  8. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
  9. 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,193
  10. 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
  11. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
  12. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
38 more
  1. 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 774
  2. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  3. 2020AWAC: Accelerating Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datasetscited by 647
  4. 2020Learning Invariant Representations for Reinforcement Learning without Reconstructioncited by 424
  5. 2021Randomized Ensembled Double Q-Learning: Learning Fast Without a Modelcited by 278
  6. 2022The Primacy Bias in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 242
  7. 2019AlgaeDICE: Policy Gradient from Arbitrary Experiencecited by 187
  8. 2023The Dormant Neuron Phenomenon in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 171
  9. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning and the Deadly Triadcited by 170
  10. 2020Controlling Overestimation Bias with Truncated Mixture of Continuous Distributional Quantile Criticscited by 154
  11. 2020Implicit Under-Parameterization Inhibits Data-Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 134
  12. 2022Understanding and Preventing Capacity Loss in Reinforcement Learningcited by 124
  13. 2020GenDICE: Generalized Offline Estimation of Stationary Valuescited by 122
  14. 2020Phasic Policy Gradientcited by 121
  15. 2021OptiDICE: Offline Policy Optimization via Stationary Distribution Correction Estimationcited by 121
  16. 2023Loss of Plasticity in Continual Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 118
  17. 2020Maxmin Q-learning: Controlling the Estimation Bias of Q-learningcited by 117
  18. 2024Disentangling the Causes of Plasticity Loss in Neural Networkscited by 82
  19. 2021Decoupling Value and Policy for Generalization in Reinforcement Learningcited by 81
  20. 2020Transient Non-Stationarity and Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 75
  21. 2020DisCor: Corrective Feedback in Reinforcement Learning via Distribution Correctioncited by 71
  22. 2021DR3: Value-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning Requires Explicit Regularizationcited by 66
  23. 2020The Value-Improvement Path: Towards Better Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
  24. 2021The Difficulty of Passive Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 50
  25. 2024Overestimation, Overfitting, and Plasticity in Actor-Critic: the Bitter Lesson of Reinforcement Learningcited by 50
  26. 2021Breaking the Deadly Triad with a Target Networkcited by 47
  27. 2023DrM: Mastering Visual Reinforcement Learning through Dormant Ratio Minimizationcited by 45
  28. 2019Towards Characterizing Divergence in Deep Q-Learningcited by 43
  29. 2023Maintaining Plasticity in Deep Continual Learningcited by 42
  30. 2020Interference and Generalization in Temporal Difference Learningcited by 41
  31. 2020Can Increasing Input Dimensionality Improve Deep Reinforcement Learning?cited by 37
  32. 2021HyAR: Addressing Discrete-Continuous Action Reinforcement Learning via Hybrid Action Representationcited by 33
  33. 2022Target Network and Truncation Overcome The Deadly Triad in Q-Learningcited by 31
  34. 2022The Phenomenon of Policy Churncited by 28
  35. 2022Human-level Atari 200x fastercited by 28
  36. 2022Overcoming the Spectral Bias of Neural Value Approximationcited by 18
  37. 2019MinAtar: An Atari-Inspired Testbed for Thorough and Reproducible Reinforcement Learning Experimentscited by 17
  38. 2020Improving Performance in Reinforcement Learning by Breaking Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 17

50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 6; 2026: 9.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Mitigating Plasticity Loss in Continual Reinforcement Learning by Reducing Churncited by 22
  2. 2025The Reasoning Boundary Paradox: How Reinforcement Learning Constrains Language Modelscited by 17
  3. 2025How Should We Meta-Learn Reinforcement Learning Algorithms?cited by 5
  4. 2026Emergence of Exploration in Policy Gradient Reinforcement Learning via Retryingcited by 5
  5. 2024Offline-to-online Reinforcement Learning for Image-based Grasping with Scarce Demonstrationscited by 2
  6. 2025GRPOformer: Advancing Hyperparameter Optimization via Group Relative Policy Optimizationcited by 2
  7. 2026The Rank and Gradient Lost in Non-stationarity: Sample Weight Decay for Mitigating Plasticity Loss in Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  8. 2026Performance Variation in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  9. 2025Is Exploration or Optimization the Problem for Deep Reinforcement Learning?cited by 1
  10. 2026Behavior-Consistent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  11. 2026The Mirage of Optimizing Training Policies: Monotonic Inference Policies as the Real Objective for LLM Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  12. 2025Scaling DRL for Decision Making: A Survey on Data, Network, and Training Budget Strategiescited by 0
4 more
  1. 2026Approximate Next Policy Sampling: Replacing Conservative Target Policy Updates in Deep RLcited by 0
  2. 2026Scalable Reinforcement Learning via Adaptive Batch Scalingcited by 0
  3. 2026Representation Learning Enables Scalable Multitask Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  4. 2026WarpSAC: Towards the Pinnacle of Scalable Off-policy RL by Rethinking Exploration and Exploitationcited by 0